







Illapa Sairitupac, a Democratic Socialists of America member running for the New York State Assembly, was arrested at least twice at protests, once at a 2021 climate demonstration and again this April inside Governor Kathy Hochul's office, before winning the Democratic primary for the 65th District on June 23.
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani endorsed Sairitupac in May, calling him one of several socialist candidates who "represent the very best of public service." Voters in Chinatown and Lower Manhattan will now decide in November whether a candidate with a protest-arrest record and a radical policy agenda belongs in Albany.
The Washington Examiner reported that Sairitupac's arrest cases do not appear in New York's public court database, raising unanswered questions about whether charges were ever filed, dropped, or sealed. His campaign did not respond to the Examiner's request for comment.
The first arrest came in the summer of 2021 at a climate protest. Details about the specific location and arresting agency remain thin. What is clear is that the experience did not deter Sairitupac from a second, more confrontational encounter with law enforcement.
That came in April, when Sairitupac joined a group that occupied Governor Hochul's office. The DSA reported that 19 people were arrested during the incident. Footage showed Sairitupac inside the building holding a sign that read, "Governor Hochul: our lives or your donors?" He was later seen outside the building, restrained by police, delivering a statement to a camera.
"The time is now. The stakes are way too high to sit it out. We've got to be confronting this, fighting for immigrants, fighting for our queer members... Tax the rich!"
He followed up on Bluesky, framing his arrest as a badge of honor:
"Last week, I was arrested while protesting Governor Hochul because she refuses to Tax the Rich and refuses to protect public services that working New Yorkers rely on, services that are being threatened by Donald Trump's cuts. I won't stop fighting."
A protest crowd chanted, "Billionaires, make them pay. We pay taxes. Why don't they?" The rhetoric is familiar. So is the pattern: occupy a government office, get arrested, post about it online, and convert the incident into campaign material.
Sairitupac is not a lone operator. He sits inside a growing network of DSA-aligned candidates in New York, and the most powerful figure in that network is now the city's mayor. Mamdani endorsed Sairitupac and other socialists in May, declaring on X that they share "a belief that government should work for everyone, not just the wealthy and well-connected."
That endorsement carries weight, and baggage. Mamdani's own first 100 days in office have drawn criticism for broken promises on housing, policing, and city services.
The mayor has also drawn fire for contradictions on law enforcement. His budget quietly added hundreds of NYPD officers despite earlier rhetoric about holding the line on police hiring, a move that raised eyebrows across the political spectrum. Endorsing a twice-arrested socialist for the state legislature while expanding the police force is the kind of incoherence that voters eventually notice.
Mamdani has separately faced sharp criticism for his posture toward legal authority. Senator John Fetterman publicly warned that Mamdani's defiance of a Supreme Court immigration ruling risked inviting a constitutional crisis. That pattern, defiance of institutional norms, contempt for legal process, now extends to the candidates Mamdani champions.
In 2023, Sairitupac spoke at a DSA event on socialism held at the People's Forum building in New York City. That venue has drawn scrutiny of its own. The Washington Examiner described the People's Forum as having received funding from Neville Singham, whom the outlet characterized as a "Chinese government-linked leftist donor."
Singham is reportedly under a Department of Justice investigation over possible financial crimes. No charges have been publicly filed. The precise nature of the alleged crimes was not detailed in the Examiner's reporting.
The connection between Sairitupac and the People's Forum appears limited to the 2023 speaking appearance. But for a candidate running on radical economic redistribution in a district that includes Chinatown, the optics of that venue, and its funding source, deserve more scrutiny than they have received.
This is not Sairitupac's first campaign. He ran for the same Assembly seat in 2022 and lost. He came back, won the June 23 Democratic primary, and now heads into November as the party's nominee for the 65th District, which covers Chinatown, Lower Manhattan, and other areas of the borough.
His platform, at least as expressed through protest slogans and social media posts, centers on taxing the wealthy and expanding public services. Whether he has a more detailed legislative agenda is unclear, his campaign declined to respond to press inquiries.
Moderate Democrats have reportedly pushed back against the socialist wave in New York, though whether any open letter specifically named Sairitupac is not confirmed. The broader tension is real: Mamdani's wing of the party is pulling New York's Democratic establishment further left, and candidates like Sairitupac are the vehicles.
Mamdani himself has not shied from controversy. He faced backlash from Jewish leaders after inflammatory remarks at a Brooklyn rally, and his endorsement record now includes a candidate whose most visible public acts involve getting arrested.
Perhaps the most telling detail is the absence of one. Sairitupac was arrested at least twice. Yet a search of New York's public court database turns up nothing under his name. The Examiner confirmed the search through the state court system's online portal.
Were charges filed and later dismissed? Were they sealed? Were they never brought in the first place? None of these questions have public answers. And Sairitupac's campaign has offered none.
For a candidate who treats arrest as activism, the silence around what happened after the handcuffs came off is conspicuous. Voters in the 65th District deserve to know whether the man asking for their vote faced any legal consequences, or whether the system simply looked the other way.
In a city where progressive prosecutors have made a habit of declining to pursue protest-related charges, the blank court record may say more about New York's justice system than about Sairitupac himself. Either way, it is a question that should be answered before November.
When getting arrested becomes a campaign credential and a sitting mayor calls it "the very best of public service," the problem is no longer one candidate. It is the system that rewards him.


