






A recorded phone call Brian Hooker made two days after his wife Lynette vanished during a nighttime boat trip in the Bahamas appears to place him in the water alongside her, a detail that, if accurate, would contradict the account he gave authorities, Fox News Digital reported.
Fellow boater Blaine Stevenson, who received the call and shared it with Fox News Digital, said Brian Hooker's own words suggest he was not simply watching from the dinghy as his wife drifted away in rough seas. Stevenson told the outlet that the call appears to contradict Hooker's story, one that investigators now seem unwilling to accept at face value.
A U.S. official told Fox News Digital that investigators are treating the case as a homicide. No charges have been publicly announced.
Brian and Lynette Hooker left shore at Hope Town in the Bahamas around 7:30 p.m. on April 4, headed back to their sailboat Soulmate. Brian Hooker told authorities that rough waters caused Lynette to fall off their dinghy during the return trip.
He arrived at Marsh Harbour around 4 a.m. on April 5, roughly eight and a half hours later, authorities said. He paddled to shore alone.
The couple had been living aboard the Soulmate full time in retirement, frequently sailing around the U.S. and Caribbean, their social media pages showed.
In the recorded call to Stevenson, Brian Hooker described the chaos on the water that night. His language is detailed and specific, and, according to maritime law expert Kenneth Engerrand, riddled with inconsistencies.
Hooker described the scene to Stevenson:
"I mean she's a regular swimmer, not like a athlete or anything, but she's f------ determined, and she was hit with a flare pistol I had slid down one of the Sponsons down towards the stern and the dinghy. I took so many waves over the dingy. I bailed about five or six times. I had to bail out the cockpit, but the the inside also got wet and so, and the dinghy key was not attached to me, you know, so when we were f------ around trying to get back in the boat."
That phrase, "trying to get back in the boat", is what Stevenson flagged. If Hooker remained in the dinghy, as he told authorities, why would he describe trying to get back in?
Hooker continued in the call, describing his efforts after Lynette went into the water:
"The waves were three foot and I was trying to ship the oars and one of the pins on the oars broke and that f----- dropped over the side and I was yelling for her the whole time and I yelled to her that I lost the oar and I threw the anchor out and anchored the dinghy. And just yeah I yelled I couldn't see her anymore...the moon has not risen yet. And the waves were doing their thing and you know, you I saw her I think twice I threw her a flotation cushion that we used to sit on the dingy, you know right after she went in, but I didn't I couldn't tell if she got it or not."
Three-foot waves. A broken oar pin. Bailing water five or six times. A flare pistol sliding around the dinghy. A flotation cushion tossed into darkness. And somewhere in the middle of it all, his wife, gone.
Kenneth Engerrand, an adjunct professor of maritime law at the University of Houston Law Center and a shareholder in the Brown Sims law firm, told Fox News Digital that the account does not hold together. In cases where forensic experts challenge the initial narrative of a death, the contradictions often become the strongest evidence. Engerrand was blunt about what he sees in Hooker's statements.
"He's saying they were in water, but at the same time, he's bailing. And at the time, she's quickly, immediately away from him by the waves and the wind and whatnot. Everything about this is inconsistent."
Engerrand went further in a separate statement to Fox News Digital:
"He's telling five different stories, and none of them are consistent. So it's as if he's just making stuff up as he goes."
The characterization is damaging. If Brian Hooker was in the dinghy the entire time, his description of events follows one logic. If he was in the water with Lynette, as the call appears to suggest, the question becomes: what actually happened between them in the dark?
The U.S. Coast Guard Investigative Services recently concluded a four-day renewed search for Lynette Hooker's body. During that search, the Coast Guard took possession of the dinghy, a move consistent with treating the vessel as evidence rather than simply a piece of property to return.
Federal U.S. authorities also sought permission from Bahamian authorities to search a new area in the Sea of Abaco with 25-foot-deep waters, sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Digital. The fact that American investigators are asking to expand the search zone in Bahamian waters signals the seriousness with which they are pursuing the case.
The Hookers' sailboat Soulmate was docked at the U.S. Coast Guard station in Fort Pierce, Florida, as of May 13, 2026, reportedly brought back from the Bahamas by the Coast Guard itself. As legal analysts have previously noted, the trajectory of this investigation points toward increasing scrutiny of the husband's account.
Brian Hooker was questioned about his wife's disappearance and held at Central Police Station in Freeport, the Bahamas. He was released from custody on April 13, 2026, and left the station. No public explanation was given for the release.
Brian Hooker's Michigan-based attorney, Crystal Marie Hauser, previously addressed the public suspicion in an interview with ABC News. She asked Americans to withhold judgment.
"I would ask those watching to treat him the way you would want to be treated, to give him the benefit of the doubt, and to consider that not all of us, nor you, considering your own relationships, the way you speak to one another, we all handle things in different ways."
Fox News Digital reached out to Hauser for comment on the recorded call. No response was reported.
The benefit of the doubt is a fair request in any case. But the benefit of the doubt is earned by consistency, and so far, Brian Hooker's account is anything but consistent, at least according to the maritime law expert and the fellow boater who actually heard him describe that night.
Cases where a spouse's story unravels under scrutiny are not uncommon. History is full of husbands whose accounts concealed far darker truths. Whether that proves true here remains to be seen. But the recorded call has changed the landscape of this investigation.
No charges have been filed. Lynette Hooker has not been found. The full contents and metadata of the recorded call have not been publicly released. The identity of the U.S. official who described the case as a homicide investigation has not been disclosed.
What is known: a woman disappeared in dark water. Her husband gave one version of events to authorities. Then, two days later, he called a friend and told what appears to be a different version, one that places him in the water with her. And now investigators have seized the dinghy, expanded the search area, and brought the couple's sailboat to a Coast Guard station in Florida.
The investigation into the disappearance of a woman under suspicious circumstances follows a familiar pattern: the initial story holds until it doesn't, and then the real questions begin.
Lynette Hooker deserves answers. So does the public. And right now, the only person who can provide them is the man whose story keeps changing.


