Don't Wait.
We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

Top Stories

Latest News

 August 31, 2025

Waters pushes 25th Amendment over Trump's Fed move

President Donald Trump’s latest clash with the Federal Reserve has sparked a firestorm, with Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., demanding the 25th Amendment to probe his fitness for office.

On Monday, August 25, 2025, Trump ousted Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, claiming she misrepresented mortgage information, a move that sent shockwaves through economic circles. Waters, appearing on MSNBC’s “The Weeknight” four days later, argued this decision threatens the nation’s financial stability. Her call for constitutional intervention feels like a political sledgehammer, but does it hold weight?

Waters’ charge hinges on the 25th Amendment, a rarely invoked mechanism to assess a president’s capacity to govern. She insists Trump’s actions signal something is “wrong” with his leadership, a claim that conveniently sidesteps the broader context of policy disagreements. For conservatives, this smells like a partisan stunt dressed up as concern for democracy.

Trump’s Bold Federal Reserve Play

Trump’s removal of Cook marked a dramatic escalation in his tug-of-war with the Federal Reserve, an institution prized for its independence. The allegation of misrepresented mortgage details sounds serious, but critics argue it’s a flimsy pretext for meddling in monetary policy. The MAGA base, however, sees this as Trump asserting control over a bloated bureaucracy.

Lisa Cook didn’t take the ousting lying down, filing a lawsuit against Trump on Thursday, August 28, 2025, to challenge her removal. She argues the president failed to meet the legal threshold for “cause,” a stance that could drag this saga to the Supreme Court. The judiciary now faces a high-stakes test of executive power versus institutional autonomy.

Cook’s legal push includes a request for a restraining order to stay on the Federal Reserve Board, signaling her determination to fight. Her case underscores a deeper question: Can a president reshape the Fed without upending economic stability? Supporters of Trump argue he’s shaking up a system too cozy with elite interests.

Waters and Democrats Sound Alarm

Waters, never shy about theatrics, warned on MSNBC that Trump’s move could “upend the entire economy.” Her dire predictions about Wall Street chaos and manipulated interest rates paint an apocalyptic picture, but they lack specifics on how Cook’s removal directly causes such havoc. This feels like fearmongering to rally the progressive base.

“It is time to call for Article [Amendment] 25,” Waters declared, urging swift action to probe Trump’s mental fitness. Her rhetoric suggests a president unhinged, yet the 25th Amendment isn’t a political toy—it’s a serious tool requiring Vice Presidential and Cabinet consensus. Throwing it around casually risks diluting its purpose.

Waters doubled down, stating, “This is one of the most destructive things that this president could do.” Her focus on “danger to democracy” sounds noble but ignores Trump’s mandate to challenge entrenched institutions. Conservatives might argue she’s more worried about losing control than protecting the nation.

Wasserman Schultz’s Sharp Critique

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., joined Waters on MSNBC, offering her own take on Trump’s motives. She claimed Trump’s real target is Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, but firing him would be “a bridge too far.” This theory paints Trump as a schemer, yet it conveniently dodges evidence of Powell’s own controversies.

Wasserman Schultz insisted Cook faces no investigation for fraud and received no preferential mortgage rates. “It’s preposterous,” she said, dismissing Trump’s rationale as baseless. Her defense of Cook is spirited, but it glosses over whether the Fed’s independence should be absolute.

Symone Sanders-Townsend, an MSNBC panelist, called Waters’ 25th Amendment push “jarring” but noted that “presidents have been impeached for much less.” Her comment hints at the political theater at play, where outrage often trumps substance. The left’s quick leap to constitutional remedies feels more like posturing than principle.

The Bigger Picture Emerges

Trump’s critics argue his Fed intervention threatens economic stability, a charge that resonates with those wary of his unconventional style. Yet, his supporters see this as a necessary push against a system that’s often insulated from public accountability. The truth likely lies in the messy middle—bold moves carry risks, but so does unchecked bureaucracy.

The Cook lawsuit, now poised for Supreme Court scrutiny, could set a precedent for presidential authority over independent agencies. For MAGA enthusiasts, this is a chance to rein in unelected elites; for Democrats, it’s a dangerous power grab. Both sides have valid points, but the hysteria over Trump’s fitness feels overblown.

As the dust settles, Waters’ 25th Amendment call seems more like a headline-grabbing tactic than a feasible solution. Trump’s Fed shakeup may be controversial, but it’s within his executive purview. The real battle will play out in court, not cable news studios, and that’s where conservatives hope clarity will prevail.

Latest Posts

See All
Newsletter
Get news from American Digest in your inbox.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, https://staging.americandigest.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
© 2025 - The American Digest - All Rights Reserved