Don't Wait.
We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:
 May 15, 2023

Trump's deposition in Strzok and Page lawsuits prohibited by Justice Department court order

A federal court handed down on Friday barred a May 24 deposition of former President Donald Trump in connection with two cases brought by former FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

The decision offered a major victory for the Justice Department in the case that has them tangling with the former president, as NBC News reported.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson followed a Justice Department motion submitted on Thursday which asked her to reevaluate a previous decision

The decision in question was one that allowed depositions of President Trump and FBI Director Christopher Wray in the lawsuits without dictating their order.

Attorneys for the government asserted, eventually prevailing, that since Wray's deposition has not yet been scheduled, Trump's may not even need to be taken.

In her order on Friday, Berman Jackson cited her February decision that Trump and Wray's depositions in lawsuits Strzok and Page filed against the Justice Department and the FBI in 2019 must last no longer than two hours and be restricted to a "narrow set of topics."

"The Court is somewhat surprised to learn that since then, the parties have done nothing more than wrangle over the order of the two depositions," Berman Jackson wrote.

"The government seems chagrined that the Court did not order that the deposition of the FBI Director be completed first, but it may recall that it was the Court’s view that it was Director Wray, the only current high-ranking public official in the group of proposed deponents, whose ongoing essential duties fell most squarely under the protection of the doctrine in question."

According to the judge's cited legal precedent, the lower-ranking government representative should be deposed first in case their answers make it unnecessary to interrogate the higher-ranking representative.

The judge went on to defend her earlier ruling: "The Court’s ruling was appropriate in light of all of the facts, including the former President’s own public statements concerning his role in the firing of the plaintiff," Berman Jackson wrote.

After text conversations that were demeaning of Trump were made public in December 2017, Strzok and Page were both fired from the investigation led by the then-special counsel Robert Mueller and when news broke Trump frequently criticized the two.

Strzok contends that he was illegally fired, while Page's lawsuit claims that privacy violations occurred.

To find out if he met with and directly pressed FBI and Justice Department officials to fire Strzok, or if he directed any White House staff members to do so, Strzok's attorneys are requesting Trump's deposition.

In her lawsuit, Page, who left her position as an FBI lawyer in May 2018, claims that Trump and his associates have hurt her reputation and that the text messages she exchanged with Strzok were improperly leaked.

Written By:
Charlotte Tyler

Latest Posts

See All
Get news from American Digest in your inbox.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
© 2024 - The American Digest - All Rights Reserved