Trump voters are rallying behind Israel’s fight against Iran, and they want Uncle Sam to join the fray. A recent Gray House poll shows that supporters of President Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign overwhelmingly endorse U.S. military and intelligence aid to Israel.
The Daily Wire reported that the poll, conducted June 15-16, 2025, surveyed 450 Trump 2024 voters, revealing strong backing for Israel’s strikes on Iran and U.S. involvement in arming the Jewish state.
With 60% male and 40% female respondents, the survey leaned older, with 35% aged 65 or above and only 7% between 18 and 29. These voters aren’t swayed by progressive talking points; they see Iran as a direct threat.
Nearly 80% of those polled support supplying Israel with offensive weapons to hit Iranian military targets. Meanwhile, 86% back defensive weapons to shield Israel from Iranian attacks, and a whopping 91% want the U.S. to share intelligence to keep Israel safe. This isn’t about warm fuzzies—it’s about hard-nosed pragmatism in a volatile region.
Eighty percent of Trump voters view Iran as a destabilizing force, sponsoring terrorism and threatening U.S. allies. The same percentage believes Iran undermines American interests in the Middle East, while 72% see it as a serious national security threat. These numbers reflect a rejection of diplomatic daydreams about Tehran’s intentions.
Seventy-three percent of respondents doubt a diplomatic deal with Iran could be trusted. The same percentage thinks Iran is likely scheming to build nuclear weapons in secret. This skepticism isn’t paranoia—it’s a response to Iran’s track record of deceit and aggression.
Dr. Mike Evans, founder of Friends of Zion, told Fox News Digital, “The Trump strategy is brilliant because he’s giving Iran a way out, but he’s not taking it off the table that the U.S. will bomb Iran.”
Evans’s confidence in Trump’s approach mirrors the poll’s findings, but it assumes Iran will blink first. That’s a bold bet when dealing with a regime that thrives on defiance.
Eighty-three percent of Trump voters back Israel’s military strikes on Iran, seeing them as a necessary check on Tehran’s ambitions. Additionally, 85% support Israel’s operations in Gaza following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack that killed over 1,200 Israelis. This isn’t just pro-Israel cheerleading—it’s a rejection of appeasing terror-sponsoring regimes.
Pastor John Hagee, chairman of Christians United for Israel, said before the strikes, “I do not think President Trump will allow himself to be played by Iranian negotiators or American isolationists.”
Hagee’s faith in Trump’s resolve is inspiring, but it sidesteps the risk of escalation in an already tense region. Still, his words resonate with voters who see strength as the only language Iran understands.
Hagee later added, “We must stand with Israel today and every day. Iran’s future as an evil force in the Middle East is now in question.” His call to action is stirring, but it leans heavily on Israel to do the heavy lifting while America plays cheerleader.
President Trump’s record bolsters these voters’ confidence, with moves like relocating the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.
The Abraham Accords, brokered under his watch, normalized ties between Israel and several Arab states. These achievements frame Trump as a decisive leader unafraid to buck globalist orthodoxy.
Seventy-two percent of voters support U.S. military action against Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons.
This isn’t reckless warmongering—it’s a demand for preemptive clarity in a world where Iran’s nuclear ambitions could spell disaster. The poll shows voters want action, not endless talks.
Evans also noted, “[Trump]’s made it very clear that if Iran does anything to attack U.S. bases in the Middle East or Americans, they will have hell to pay.” His bluntness captures the mood of Trump voters, but it risks painting the U.S. into a corner where retaliation becomes inevitable. Diplomacy, though distrusted, might still have a role.
Hagee’s post-strike comment, “Now the U.S. must take its seat at the head of the international table and stand alongside the only American ally in the free world willing to do what is necessary,” underscores the poll’s findings. Yet, his vision of America as a global enforcer could stretch resources thin in a multipolar world. Voters seem to agree, but at what cost?
