The Trump administration took a significant step by offering nearly 2 million federal employees an unusual resignation incentive aimed at reducing the federal workforce.
NBC News reported that federal workers can resign now but continue receiving pay and benefits until September 30, 2025, as part of a "deferred resignation" initiative.
The administration's program is designed to result in substantial savings while potentially reshaping the structure of the federal workforce.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt emphasized that the salaries of federal employees are funded by taxpayers, who deserve a diligent workforce physically present in federal buildings.
Under this new initiative, federal workers are given the chance to agree to a deferred resignation. This means that they officially resign but remain on payroll and keep their benefits until the stipulated date. By taking up this offer, the Trump administration anticipates a decrease of 5% to 10% in the federal workforce.
The administration forecasts that this reduction could save the government approximately $100 billion. The plan excludes military personnel, postal workers, and certain other job categories, focusing on full-time federal employees.
To communicate this option, an email titled "Fork in the Road" was sent to eligible employees.
The email, whose title mirrors a previous communication style of Elon Musk, included details on how employees could resign by simply replying with the word "resign."
The resignation window for federal employees spans from January 30 to February 6, during which employees can decide whether to accept the offer.
Those opting to resign are relieved from reporting to work in person but continue receiving their usual pay and benefits until September 2025.
Karoline Leavitt, while discussing the buyout, stated that taxpayers paid for federal buildings and federal government employee salaries, asserting the expectation of physical presence. She argued that the program offers a generous eight-month payout for those unwilling to return to office work.
Leavitt added that employees choosing to stay would be appreciated for their focus on serving the American people and contributing to an enhanced federal workforce.
While the administration pushes for this innovative approach to reshaping the workforce, not everyone is supportive of the plan.
Everett Kelley, the National President of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), expressed concerns about its long-term effects.
Kelley noted that despite the federal workforce's size remaining consistent since 1970, the demand for public services has increased dramatically. He warned of severe unintended consequences if a significant portion of the workforce departs.
The potential for chaos in delivering essential services to the American public is a significant concern for those skeptical of the initiative. Kelley criticized the administration's policies as attempts to create a hostile environment that pressures workers to leave.
As the second week in February approaches, federal workers must weigh the benefits of this program against the potential long-term ramifications for public service. Some employees may view the buyout as an opportunity, while others fear the loss of experienced civil servants.