Don't Wait.
We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:
 January 20, 2023

Supreme Court investigation fails to determine source of Dobbs leak

The Supreme Court announced on Thursday that it was unable to determine the identity of the person who leaked a draft of the court's decision that led to overturning Roe v. Wade.

The investigation, ongoing since the leak in May, concluded without answers concerning the person or people involved in the leak.

The investigation

"The investigation limited the pool of suspects to a 'small' group of mainly law clerks, according to the court’s Thursday statement. The marshal’s team asked the suspects basic questions such as, 'Did you do it? Do you know anyone who had a reason to do it?' and conducted forensic analysis," the Daily Caller reported.

"Nine months later, the court concluded that the investigation did not successfully identify the individual who leaked the case, according to the court’s document. The court recently consulted former Secretary of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff who advised the marshal’s team that he 'cannot identify any additional useful investigative measures,'” it added.

The controversy

"The Court investigators will continue following up on leads if more information is learned," said Michael Chertoff, former DHS secretary and a former federal appeals judge.

"In the meantime, the Court has already taken steps to increase security and tighten controls regarding the handling of sensitive documents," it continued.

"Most significantly, the Chief Justice has also directed a comprehensive review of the Court's information and document security protocols to mitigate the risk of future incidents," he added.

The investigation limited the potential people with access to the draft to about 80 people. The person who leaked the information is likely still working at the court.

The failure to find the leaker has led to widespread frustration among Americans, with many sounding off on social media following the court's announcement.

The problem seems to be more about pursuing the information to find the source of the leak rather than the ability to do so, with much speculation swirling concerning why.

Many conclude the court's ruling is political, adding to growing accusations of partisanship in the nation's highest court.

Written By:
Dillon Burroughs

Latest Posts

See All
Get news from American Digest in your inbox.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
© 2024 - The American Digest - All Rights Reserved