Don't Wait.
We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:
 July 18, 2024

'Rust' Armorer Hannah Gutierrez Seeks Conviction Dismissal After After Baldwin's Charges Dismissed

Hannah Gutierrez, the armorer on the "Rust" film set, has sought to dismiss her conviction in light of new evidence emerging from Alec Baldwin's dismissed charges.

Reuters reported that Gutierrez has filed a motion to dismiss her conviction following the exoneration of Alec Baldwin, citing withheld evidence by prosecutors.

Gutierrez, who served as the armorer during the 2021 shooting of the movie "Rust," faced legal consequences after a tragic incident on set.

The event led to severe legal repercussions for Gutierrez after a live round, inadvertently loaded by her, was discharged by Alec Baldwin during a scene setup, resulting in a fatal accident.

The Sequence of Legal Events Post-Incident

Following the incident, a rigorous investigation unfolded, leading to charges against both Baldwin and Gutierrez. However, Baldwin's charges were recently dropped after it was revealed that prosecutors had withheld critical evidence about the live rounds used on set.

This pivotal disclosure prompted Gutierrez to file a motion on July 16 to dismiss her conviction. Her legal team argues that the same grounds that led to Baldwin's exoneration—non-disclosure of crucial evidence—should apply to her case as well.

The judge’s decision to dismiss Baldwin's charges centered around the concealment of live rounds that had been given to police. These rounds, crucially, had the potential to identify the source of the fatal shot.

Gutierrez's legal team has brought to light several key pieces of evidence that were not previously disclosed to her defense. This includes the existence of live rounds handed over to police that were never tested or examined by the state prosecutor, Kari Morrissey.

According to Gutierrez's lawyer, Jason Bowles, he had contacted Morrissey in January to discuss the testing of these rounds. However, Morrissey reportedly dismissed the need for testing, stating that these rounds appeared different from those found on the set.

This refusal to test the rounds could have pivotal implications for Gutierrez's defense, suggesting possible mismanagement or oversight in handling evidence.

Expert Testimonies and Interviews Not Disclosed

Further complicating the case, undisclosed evidence includes an interview with "Rust" props supplier Seth Kenney and a report on Baldwin's gun by firearm expert Lucien Haag. These documents, which could provide additional context to the events leading to the tragedy, were not made available to Gutierrez's defense team.

Another significant piece of undisclosed evidence involves Troy Teske, linked to Gutierrez through her stepfather. Teske turned in three rounds similar to those found on the set, yet these too were excluded from official testing and analysis.

The non-disclosure of these elements forms the backbone of Gutierrez's motion for dismissal, arguing that this oversight deprived her of a fair trial.

The legal proceedings are ongoing, and a hearing on the motion filed by Gutierrez must now be scheduled by Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer. The outcome of this hearing could potentially alter the legal landscape for Gutierrez, offering her a chance at exoneration similar to Baldwin's.

In light of these developments, Gutierrez’s defense remains hopeful. The arguments for dismissal are strongly based on the precedent set by the dismissal of charges against Baldwin and the evidence allegedly concealed by the prosecution.

As quoted by her lawyer, "The buried evidence of live rounds, and other information concealed from defense lawyers, were grounds for dismissal or a new trial," highlighting the critical nature of transparency and fairness in legal proceedings.

Conclusion

The case of Hannah Gutierrez continues to evolve as new evidence and legal arguments come to light.

The motion to dismiss her conviction hinges on the comprehensive reevaluation of the withheld evidence and its implications for her defense.

As the judicial system proceeds with this case, the principles of justice and the integrity of legal processes remain at the forefront of this significant legal battle.

Written By:
Christina Davie

Latest Posts

See All
Newsletter
Get news from American Digest in your inbox.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, https://staging.americandigest.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
© 2024 - The American Digest - All Rights Reserved