On Wednesday, December 24, 2025, Piers Morgan and Candace Owens locked horns on “Piers Morgan Uncensored” over explosive claims surrounding the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk, with Owens hinting at a cover-up by TPUSA insiders and questioning the lone-assassin narrative of suspect Tyler Robinson.
Owens has been speaking out frequently about Kirk's death, but no evidence has surfaced that supports her claims. Futhermore, Kirk's widow Erika Kirk has disavowed the claims and asked Owens to stop spreading the claims.
The drama kicked off earlier in the week when Owens met privately with Erika Kirk on Monday, December 22, 2025, presumably to discuss the tragedy that shook the conservative movement.
Fast forward to the Wednesday clash, and Owens didn’t hold back, casting doubt on whether Tyler Robinson, charged with aggravated murder and a slew of other serious offenses like felony firearm discharge and witness tampering, truly acted alone. She’s poking holes in the official story, and conservatives who value truth over narrative are listening.
Robinson’s rap sheet is no small matter—obstruction of justice for hiding a rifle, discarding clothing, and even instructing a roommate to erase texts shows a calculated effort to dodge accountability. From a conservative lens, this screams for deeper scrutiny, not blind acceptance of the first suspect nabbed.
Owens went further, suggesting that some within TPUSA might be hiding key details about Kirk’s assassination. She’s not accusing them of pulling the trigger, but a cover-up? That’s a bombshell that demands answers, not dismissal.
Piers Morgan, ever the skeptic, pushed back hard, accusing Owens of muddying her own message. “You specifically said, you didn’t say complicit in a cover-up, you said complicit in the murder,” Morgan fired at her, trying to pin down her exact stance (Piers Morgan, “Piers Morgan Uncensored”).
Owens wasn’t having it, doubling down with a sharp retort. “Let me clarify for you, you can keep saying what I said or you can listen to what I am saying,” she shot back, insisting she meant a cover-up, not direct involvement in the killing (Candace Owens, “Piers Morgan Uncensored”). Well, Piers, sometimes listening is harder than debating, isn’t it?
Owens also pointed out the public’s growing distrust in media narratives, a sentiment many conservatives share in this era of progressive spin. If even a fraction of her concerns about hidden motives or suppressed facts is true, it’s a gut punch to fair reporting.
Meanwhile, “The Charlie Kirk Show” producer Blake Neff has already pushed back against Owens’ claims, arguing they’ve sparked harassment against TPUSA. It’s a messy fallout, but silencing tough questions isn’t the answer—digging for the truth is.
From a right-of-center view, this isn’t just podcast drama; it’s about whether the conservative movement can police its own without bowing to pressure. If there’s even a whiff of buried information, every patriot should demand clarity, not circle the wagons.
Morgan’s challenge to Owens—trying to nail down who exactly at TPUSA she’s pointing fingers at—shows he’s not letting vague accusations slide. But let’s be real: vague or not, these claims can’t be ignored when a leader like Kirk is taken from us.
For parents and retirees who look to conservative voices like Kirk for guidance, the stakes couldn’t be higher. If trust in our own institutions—be it TPUSA or the media—erodes due to perceived secrecy, the cultural cost is paired with real-world risks like diminished political influence or misallocated donor funds.
At the end of the day, this clash between Morgan and Owens isn’t just a spat—it’s a call to action for conservatives to demand accountability, no matter who’s in the hot seat. Justice for Charlie Kirk isn’t negotiable, and neither is the truth, even if it stings. So, let’s keep asking the hard questions until every shadow is lit.
