A law enforcement source has confirmed a stunning development in the aftermath of the alleged assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk: Lance Twiggs, the transgender roommate and romantic partner of accused killer Tyler Robinson, is no longer under FBI protection.
Lance Twiggs, 22, has not been charged with any crime related to the September 10, 2025, shooting at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, where Robinson allegedly killed Kirk during a Turning Point USA event.
The FBI has not publicly disclosed why Twiggs’s protective detail was discontinued. Court documents reveal Robinson texted Twiggs before the incident, directing him to “look under my keyboard,” where a note allegedly outlined plans to target Kirk.
Authorities claim Robinson later confirmed the act via text to Twiggs, who has since moved out of state and retained an attorney. A relative noted that Twiggs and family members initially received FBI protection due to threats following the shooting. Retired FBI agent Jason Pack explained that such protection often ends once key evidence is secured and no credible threats remain.
Let’s dig into the personal history here. Twiggs, who began transitioning from male to female, faced family struggles, including being kicked out at 18, before moving into a townhome in St. George, Utah. A relative shared that Twiggs battled drug and alcohol issues alongside identity challenges, Fox News reported.
Despite this, the relative noted, “He was maintaining a job and able to pay rent,” showing a level of independence. Twiggs initially lived with college roommates who later moved out, paving the way for Robinson to move in. Their relationship soon turned romantic, lasting until Robinson’s arrest.
The issue has sparked debate over the FBI’s role in protecting individuals tied to high-profile cases. While Twiggs cooperated by providing critical evidence like texts and a handwritten note, questions linger about whether ending protection was premature. With Robinson in custody since September, some wonder if the threat level was adequately assessed.
Jason Pack, a retired FBI special agent, offered insight into the bureau’s decision-making. He suggested that protective details, while vital, are costly and cannot be indefinite without clear danger. Pack added that the FBI’s role “is done — though it can always be reevaluated if circumstances change.”
That’s a fair point, but in a case this volatile, shouldn’t there be more transparency? The public deserves to know if Twiggs’s safety—or that of others tied to this tragedy—remains at risk. Ending protection without explanation fuels distrust in federal agencies already under fire for perceived overreach.
Robinson’s alleged motive adds another layer of complexity. Officials claim he told investigators he “had enough of his hatred” when explaining why he targeted Kirk. That kind of rhetoric points to a deeper cultural clash that’s tearing at the nation’s fabric.
Kirk, a prominent voice against progressive policies, was a lightning rod for controversy. His events often drew passionate crowds—both supporters and detractors. Robinson’s actions, if proven, reflect how ideological battles can spiral into violence when dialogue fails.
Yet, let’s not rush to paint Twiggs as complicit. No charges have been filed, and early cooperation with authorities suggests a willingness to aid the investigation. Still, the optics of a close relationship with an accused killer raise eyebrows.
Robinson faces severe charges, including aggravated murder and witness tampering, with a court hearing set for January 16 on a motion to remove the Utah County Attorney’s Office from the case. If granted, a special prosecutor could delay proceedings, including the state’s push for the death penalty. This legal wrangling only prolongs the pain for Kirk’s family and supporters.
Beyond the courtroom, this tragedy underscores a chilling reality. Conservative voices like Kirk’s are increasingly targeted, not just with words but with deadly intent. It’s a stark reminder that free speech comes at a steep cost in today’s polarized climate.
While empathy is due to Twiggs, who faced personal struggles and now navigates life after this ordeal, the focus must remain on justice for Kirk. The FBI’s decision to end protection may be procedural, but it risks sending a message that those tied to such cases are on their own too soon. Let’s hope authorities remain vigilant if new threats emerge.
