Don't Wait.
We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:
By Mae Slater on
 August 29, 2024

Jim Jordan Subpoenas Firm Tied To Trump Judge Merchan's Daughter

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan has issued a subpoena to Authentic Campaigns, a political consulting firm linked to the daughter of Judge Juan Merchan.

Newsweek reported that the subpoena is part of Jordan's investigation into potential conflicts of interest involving Judge Merchan, who presided over the trial that convicted former President Donald Trump of falsifying business records.

Jordan's investigation focuses on the connection between Judge Merchan's daughter, Loren Merchan, a partner at Authentic Campaigns, and the possibility of undue influence on the trial.

Authentic Campaigns is known for its work with prominent Democratic figures, including President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

Jordan’s concerns stem from the belief held by Trump supporters that Judge Merchan should have recused himself from the trial due to his daughter's involvement with a firm that raises funds for political opponents of Trump.

Jordan Seeks Documents and Deposition

In his efforts to probe this potential conflict of interest, Jordan has demanded that Michael Nellis, founder and CEO of Authentic Campaigns, provide documents and sit for a deposition.

The committee is particularly interested in any communications between Authentic Campaigns and Judge Merchan that might suggest bias during Trump's trial.

Michael Nellis, however, has strongly denied any connection between his company and the trial.

He criticized Jordan's actions, describing the investigation as "a disgraceful misuse of power" and a waste of taxpayer dollars. Nellis maintains that Authentic Campaigns had no involvement in the trial, dismissing the allegations as "completely false and purely politically motivated."

Throughout the trial, Trump and his legal team requested that Judge Merchan recuse himself on three separate occasions, each time citing the alleged conflict of interest due to his daughter's role at Authentic Campaigns.

Despite these requests, Judge Merchan refused to step down, asserting that the claims were unsubstantiated and did not warrant his recusal.

Judge Merchan's most recent rejection of a recusal request came on August 13, solidifying his role in overseeing the case until its conclusion. The trial ended with Trump being found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records, a verdict that has further fueled the controversy surrounding Merchan's impartiality.

Trump’s Sentencing and Ongoing Investigation

Donald Trump's sentencing for his conviction is scheduled for September 18. As this date approaches, Jordan's investigation into the possible conflicts of interest surrounding Judge Merchan continues to gain momentum.

Jordan has publicly accused prosecutors, including Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, of abusing their authority by pursuing charges against Trump.

He has specifically pointed to the relationship between Loren Merchan and her father's role in the trial as a potential area of bias that could have influenced the trial's outcome.

Michael Nellis has been vocal about his opposition to the subpoena, taking to social media to express his frustration. He referred to the subpoena as "yet another abuse of power," aimed at promoting what he called a "baseless right-wing conspiracy theory."

Nellis has indicated that Authentic Campaigns will review the subpoena with their legal team before deciding how to proceed. Despite previously informing Jordan that there was "nothing to produce" regarding communications with Judge Merchan, the investigation continues to press forward.

Jordan's Concerns Over Impartiality

Jim Jordan's office has yet to comment further on the subpoena, but his earlier statements suggest that he remains concerned about the impartiality of Judge Merchan.

Jordan's primary focus appears to be on the potential financial benefits that Loren Merchan and Authentic Campaigns may have received as a result of Trump's prosecution and conviction.

This ongoing investigation highlights the broader tensions between the judiciary and political figures, particularly in cases involving high-profile individuals like Donald Trump.

The outcome of Jordan's inquiry could have significant implications for both the legal and political landscapes.

Written By:
Mae Slater

Latest Posts

See All
Newsletter
Get news from American Digest in your inbox.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, https://staging.americandigest.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
© 2024 - The American Digest - All Rights Reserved