Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nabbed Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadorian migrant, in Baltimore, sparking a firestorm of legal and community pushback. His arrest on Monday has reignited debates over deportation policies. The right sees order restored; the left cries foul.
Fox News reported that ICE apprehended Abrego Garcia at their Baltimore Field Office, aiming to deport him to a third country, possibly Uganda. His lawyers scrambled, filing an emergency habeas petition in Maryland’s U.S. District Court.
The case landed with Judge Paula Xinis, no stranger to Abrego Garcia’s saga. Judge Xinis has been handling a civil case since March 2025 to block Abrego Garcia’s deportation to El Salvador.
Last month, she issued an order halting ICE from detaining him—yet here we are. Progressive advocates call this a betrayal of justice; conservatives argue it’s enforcing the law.
ICE’s move came despite Xinis’ July 2025 order protecting Abrego Garcia from arrest. The agency notified his attorneys on August 22 that deportation to Uganda was imminent, citing a recent U.S.-Uganda deal. This smells like bureaucracy thumbing its nose at the judiciary.
Abrego Garcia’s legal team, led by Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, fired back with a lawsuit. “Mr. Abrego Garcia has filed a new lawsuit ... challenging his confinement and ... deportation,” Sandoval-Moshenberg said, demanding a fair trial. Critics of the progressive agenda might argue he’s had plenty of chances.
The lawyer insists Abrego Garcia deserves his day in immigration court with full appeal rights. Meanwhile, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem took to social media, crowing that President Trump “will not allow [him] to terrorize American citizens.” Her claim that Abrego Garcia is an MS-13 gang member lacks public evidence, stirring skepticism.
Before ICE swooped in, about 200 supporters gathered at a 6 a.m. candlelight vigil outside the Baltimore ICE office. Immigration advocates, faith leaders, and locals stood with Abrego Garcia and his wife, Jennifer, who addressed the crowd. Such displays tug heartstrings but don’t erase legal realities.
Abrego Garcia’s history is a tangled web of deportations and returns. Previously sent to El Salvador by the Trump administration, he was brought back to the U.S. after a federal judge and the Supreme Court intervened, citing a 2019 court order violation. Justice prevailed then, but at what cost now?
Upon his return, Abrego Garcia faced human smuggling charges from a 2022 Tennessee traffic stop. Detained until last Friday, he was released under electronic surveillance and ordered to check in with ICE in Maryland. Freedom was short-lived; ICE’s Uganda plan blindsided his team.
ICE’s August 22 notice gave Abrego Garcia’s attorneys a 72-hour window (excluding weekends) before potential deportation to Uganda.
The U.S. struck a deal with Uganda last week to accept deported migrants, a move conservatives cheer as innovative. Progressives, however, see it as outsourcing human rights headaches.
Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, doubled down on August 24 during “The Big Weekend Show.” “He [Abrego Garcia] is absolutely going to be deported,” Homan declared, noting Uganda as a possible destination. His confidence signals a no-nonsense approach, though it risks alienating moderates.
Homan didn’t stop there. “For now, he can enjoy the little time he has with his family,” he said, adding that Abrego Garcia’s family could join him in deportation.
The quip, while sharp, underscores a policy prioritizing borders over sentiment—fair or not. Abrego Garcia’s case exposes the messy clash between immigration enforcement and judicial oversight.
ICE’s defiance of Xinis’s order raises questions about accountability, even for those who back strict border policies. The rule of law cuts both ways, and conservatives should demand clarity.
The vigil’s 200 attendees reflect a community desperate to shield one of their own. Yet, Noem’s MS-13 accusation, if unsubstantiated, fuels distrust in government claims—a trap the right should avoid. Facts, not feelings, must guide this debate.
