France’s bold move to summon U.S. Ambassador Charles Kushner on Monday, signals a brewing diplomatic storm over accusations of antisemitism tied to French policy.
Fox News reported that the clash began when Kushner, a Jewish real estate magnate and father-in-law to Ivanka Trump, penned a letter to French President Emmanuel Macron, alleging that France’s rhetoric on recognizing a Palestinian state fuels antisemitic violence.
This sparked outrage in Paris, with the French foreign ministry labeling the claims “unacceptable” and a breach of international norms.
Kushner’s letter didn’t mince words, asserting that French statements embolden extremists and endanger Jewish communities.
France, quick to counter, insisted it has been “fully mobilized” against antisemitic acts since Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack on Israel. The transatlantic spat reveals deeper tensions over how allies navigate the Israel-Palestine debate.
On August 24, 2025, France’s foreign ministry fired back, condemning Kushner’s accusations as a violation of diplomatic protocol.
They argued his claims undermine the trust vital to U.S.-France relations. It’s a classic case of diplomatic overreach meeting a hypersensitive response.
“Public statements haranguing Israel and gestures toward recognizing a Palestinian state embolden extremists,” Kushner wrote, equating anti-Zionism with antisemitism.
His bluntness cuts through the usual diplomatic fog, but France sees it as meddling in their domestic affairs. The truth likely lies in a gray zone where both sides have valid points.
Kushner urged France to “act decisively” by enforcing hate-crime laws and protecting Jewish institutions. While his call for action resonates with those frustrated by rising antisemitism, France’s bristling at being lectured suggests a cultural disconnect. Nobody likes being told how to run their house, especially not a U.S. ally.
The French foreign ministry didn’t hold back, declaring antisemitic acts “intolerable” and rejecting Kushner’s allegations outright.
“France firmly rejects these allegations,” they stated, doubling down on their commitment to fighting hate. Yet, their indignation feels performative when antisemitic incidents persist across Europe.
France summoned Kushner to Paris on August 25, 2025, demanding he explain his provocative letter. This diplomatic slap on the wrist underscores France’s sensitivity to external criticism, especially from a Trump-appointed ambassador. It’s less about dialogue and more about saving face.
The U.S. State Department, far from backing down, stood by Kushner. Spokesperson Tommy Pigott praised him, saying, “Ambassador Kushner is doing a great job advancing our national interests.” This unwavering support highlights the Trump administration’s alignment with Israel and its no-nonsense approach to allies.
President Macron’s criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the Gaza conflict adds fuel to this diplomatic fire. Kushner’s letter aligns with President Trump’s staunch support for Netanyahu, revealing a divide in how the U.S. and France view the Middle East. It’s a proxy battle fought with words, not weapons.
Charles Kushner, a real estate developer pardoned by Trump for past tax evasion and illegal campaign donation charges, carries a controversial past into his ambassadorial role.
His personal history, while irrelevant to the core issue, adds a layer of intrigue to France’s irritation. The French likely see a political appointee flexing beyond his mandate.
Kushner’s Jewish identity lends weight to his accusations, but France argues he’s overstepping by tying their Palestinian state rhetoric to antisemitism.
The logic holds some water—words from leaders can inflame tensions—but France’s defensive posture ignores the real-world impact of their policies. It’s a debate where both sides dig in, refusing to blink.
France’s claim that Kushner’s letter violates international law feels like a stretch, a diplomatic jab to assert sovereignty. Accusing him of undermining the transatlantic partnership seems more about posturing than substance. Still, trust between allies frays when public spats replace private talks.
The U.S. doubling down via Pigott’s statement shows no appetite for de-escalation. Kushner’s role as a Trump loyalist makes him a lightning rod for criticism, especially in a France skeptical of MAGA’s worldview. Yet, his point about protecting Jewish communities deserves a hearing, not a summons.
