In a Senate vote that could reshape America’s stance at the United Nations, former Florida Congressman Mike Waltz has been confirmed as the new U.S. ambassador to the U.N.
The confirmation, which passed on Friday with a tight 47-43 margin, marks a significant moment for American interests at the global body, as highlighted by Jason Miller, a former senior advisor to President Donald Trump’s campaign team.
During an interview on Breitbart News Saturday with Washington bureau chief Matthew Boyle, Miller didn’t hold back on why this matters. He painted a grim picture of the U.N. as a hotbed of anti-American scheming, long overdue for a strong hand to steer it right.
Miller pulled no punches, claiming the U.N. has been overrun by influences that clash with American values. “We haven’t had a real ambassador to the U.N. — literally going on years now,” he said, pointing to what he sees as a takeover by globalist agendas.
His critique didn’t stop there. Miller argued that behind closed doors, forces are at work against U.S. interests, from free speech suppression to anti-Israel maneuvers, all while the U.S. foots a hefty bill for the organization.
Enter Mike Waltz, who Miller believes is the remedy to this mess. He described Waltz as a staunch ally of Trump, ready to roll up his sleeves and protect American priorities at every turn.
Miller’s enthusiasm for Waltz’s confirmation is rooted in a belief that the U.N. needs a tough enforcer. He sees Waltz as a “sheriff” of sorts, patrolling the corridors of global diplomacy to catch shady dealings before they harm the U.S.
“Having someone there who’s the watchdog, the sheriff who’s on top of these things at all times is critically important,” Miller asserted. And frankly, it’s hard to argue with the need for vigilance when taxpayer dollars are funding an institution accused of working against us.
Let’s be clear: the U.N. isn’t a tea party. Miller warned of nations “moving and scheming” to undermine American principles, a claim that should make any patriot pause and question the status quo.
The behind-the-scenes gamesmanship at the U.N. is what really seems to irk Miller. He highlighted how other countries push resolutions and shuffle funds in ways that could hurt American interests or bolster anti-freedom causes.
It’s a murky world of international politics, and Miller believes Waltz is the right person to shine a light on it. His confidence in Waltz as a direct line to the president means public attention can be drawn to these underhanded tactics.
Waltz’s role, as Miller sees it, isn’t just diplomatic—it’s defensive. With so much U.S. funding at stake, ensuring it doesn’t bankroll anti-American activities is a priority that resonates with anyone tired of seeing our resources misused.
Miller’s point about funding hits a nerve. The United States pours significant resources into the U.N., and yet, per Miller, we’ve lacked a true advocate to ensure those dollars align with our values.
Waltz’s confirmation, by a razor-thin Senate margin, signals a potential shift. It’s a chance to reclaim influence in an arena where Miller believes we’ve been outmaneuvered for far too long by globalist and progressive agendas.
At the end of the day, Miller’s hope—and likely that of many Americans—is that Waltz will stand firm as a protector of our interests. If the U.N. is indeed a battleground of ideas and influence, then having a proven ally in the ambassador’s seat might just be the edge we need to turn the tide.
