Dr. Kevin O’Connor, once Joe Biden’s White House physician, is dodging a House Oversight Committee subpoena with a flimsy excuse about doctor-patient privilege.
Breitbart reported that his lawyer’s plea for a delay until late July or early August reeks of stalling tactics, raising eyebrows about what he’s hiding. The committee, led by the tenacious Rep. James Comer, isn’t buying it and wants answers now.
O’Connor, who served as Biden’s doctor, is under scrutiny for what he knew about the former president’s physical and cognitive health during his term.
The House Oversight Committee, chaired by Comer, is probing allegations of a White House cover-up regarding Biden’s deteriorating condition. This investigation aims to uncover whether the public was misled about the commander-in-chief’s fitness to lead.
Comer’s committee first sought O’Connor’s testimony in July last year, but the Biden White House stonewalled the request. Undeterred, Comer renewed the push in May, escalating to a subpoena in June when cooperation remained elusive. O’Connor’s sudden concern for confidentiality seems conveniently timed to avoid tough questions.
O’Connor’s lawyer fired off a letter to Comer on Saturday, begging for a delay to “protect the very substantial privilege” between O’Connor and Biden.
Protect privilege, or protect secrets? The committee’s rules allow O’Connor to invoke privilege on specific questions, not to dodge the entire deposition, making his request look like a desperate sidestep.
The House Oversight Committee has made it clear: O’Connor can’t just wave off the subpoena because of privilege concerns. Deposition guidelines let the chairman rule on each privilege claim, ensuring the process stays fair but firm. Comer’s team is ready to hold O’Connor’s feet to the fire, privilege or not.
The investigation zeros in on Biden’s physical and cognitive decline while in office, a topic that’s sparked fierce debate. Allegations swirl that the White House, with media complicity, deliberately hid Biden’s struggles for political gain. CNN’s Jake Tapper even admitted in May that the administration deceived the public about Biden’s capacity to govern.
Tapper’s bombshell admission sent shockwaves through political circles, fueling Republican outrage. Conservative commentators and GOP leaders pounced, slamming the White House for what they call a calculated cover-up. The public deserves transparency, not a curated facade, they argue.
O’Connor’s role as Biden’s physician places him at the heart of this controversy. If he knew about Biden’s health issues and stayed silent, his testimony could expose a damning breach of trust. His hesitation to testify only deepens suspicions of a coordinated effort to shield Biden’s vulnerabilities.
The White House’s initial block of O’Connor’s testimony last July set the stage for this showdown. By thwarting the committee’s early efforts, the administration invited skepticism about its motives. Comer’s persistence in renewing the request shows he’s not letting this slide.
Comer’s subpoena in June was a bold move to force O’Connor’s compliance. The chairman’s no-nonsense approach signals that excuses won’t cut it when the stakes are this high. Americans have a right to know if their leader’s health was misrepresented.
O’Connor’s lawyer claims the delay is needed to negotiate a deal that respects confidentiality. But why the sudden urgency for an “accommodation” after months of resistance? It’s hard not to see this as a tactic to run out the clock or dodge accountability altogether.
The committee’s investigation isn’t just about O’Connor—it’s about restoring trust in government. If the White House misled the public about Biden’s health, the fallout could reshape how we view political transparency. Comer’s probe is a step toward ensuring that truth trumps political expediency.
Republican leaders argue that media outlets played a role in suppressing the truth about Biden’s condition. Tapper’s admission lends credence to their claims, exposing cracks in the narrative of a fully capable president. The public’s frustration with being kept in the dark is palpable.
O’Connor’s testimony could be a turning point, shedding light on what happened behind closed White House doors. His reluctance to face the committee only fuels speculation that there’s more to this story than meets the eye. Americans aren’t naive—they can smell a cover-up from a mile away.
