Don't Wait.
We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

Top Stories

Latest News

 February 6, 2024

DC Trump trial no longer on fast track, trial could be delayed until after election

The extended delay in the appellate panel's ruling on former President Donald Trump's claim of immunity from prosecution, alongside the resulting disruption in the January 6 case, serves as a noteworthy concern for Special Counsel Jack Smith.

The case, heard by a panel of three judges from the United States Appeals Circuit for the District of Columbia on January 9, revolves around Trump's assertion of presidential immunity.

The proceedings

Throughout the proceedings, Judges Karen Henderson, Michelle Childs, and Florence Pan demonstrated skepticism toward Trump's expansive interpretation of presidential prerogatives.

Despite the passage of nearly a month since the hearing, there has been no definitive ruling from the panel. Notably, the composition of the panel, with Judge Henderson appointed by President George H.W. Bush, Judge Childs by President Biden, and Judge Pan by President Obama, underscores the diverse perspectives at play.

This prolonged silence raises various questions, particularly given the expedited nature of the issue's consideration on the circuit's docket.

Calendar date removed

The absence of a ruling has resulted in significant disruptions to the trial timeline overseen by Judge Tanya Chutkan. The trial, initially scheduled for March 9, has been indefinitely postponed, leaving prospective jurors in limbo.

Speculation abounds regarding the reasons for the panel's delay. One possibility is that the judges are diligently working towards a unanimous decision on a matter of constitutional importance.

Another hypothesis is that they are crafting an opinion designed to withstand scrutiny from the Supreme Court, an institution appellate judges are wary of being overturned by.

The implications

The implications of this extended process are far-reaching, particularly in light of Smith's motivations for expeditiously advancing the case.

In correspondence with the Supreme Court, Smith emphasized the compelling public interest in prosecuting Trump for alleged involvement in overturning the 2020 election.

He stopped short of explicitly articulating a desire to try Trump before any potential return to the White House.

The continued delay in the appellate panel's ruling underscores the urgency felt by Smith and the broader legal community. The case's significance extends beyond the immediate parties involved, reflecting broader concerns about presidential accountability and the rule of law.

As the legal proceedings unfold, those involved await a definitive resolution as Trump seeks his comeback bid for the White House in a rematch against President Joe Biden that is likely to continue the former president's legal controversy.

Written By:
Dillon Burroughs

Latest Posts

See All
Newsletter
Get news from American Digest in your inbox.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, https://staging.americandigest.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
© 2024 - The American Digest - All Rights Reserved