The Biden administration's limited compliance with a congressional request for critical financial documents involving ActBlue has raised significant concerns.
House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer and House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil have been seeking access to Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) related to this Democratic fundraising platform.
Just The News reported that in response to concerns over foreign influence in U.S. elections, congressional inquiries into ActBlue are intensifying as lawmakers push for full access to financial records held by the Treasury Department.
SARs are required under federal law when banks suspect money laundering or other dubious activities. The Committees sought these reports due to potential foreign interference and security lapses in ActBlue's practices, seeking transparency on the same.
Initially, the Committees made their first attempt to access these reports last fall. They were informed of the potential existence of hundreds of such SARs, but it was not until January 2, 2025, that the Biden Treasury Department released limited documentation, according to the Committees.
Concerns have emerged about ActBlue's processes for verifying donor identities. Critics, including members of Congress, have pointed out that the platform failed to use security tools like the CVV number on credit cards to confirm identities. This lapse has been a focal point, suggesting potential vulnerabilities in the fundraising system.
Moreover, lawmakers expressed apprehension about illegal foreign contributions entering the U.S. political system, potentially exploiting ActBlue's platform.
Worries have been raised about nations like Iran, Russia, Venezuela, and China potentially using the platform for money laundering.
Engaging with multiple agencies, Congress directed requests for more information to the U.S. Treasury, FBI, and the Director of National Intelligence. This broad approach underscores the gravity of the situation, addressing fears of foreign actors manipulating U.S. politics through illicit donations.
ActBlue, in response to the mounting scrutiny, has revised its donor verification procedures. The updated policies now include the rejection of high-risk foreign donations.
These changes align with the introduction of the SHIELD Act on September 6, aiming to fortify against foreign meddling in the electoral process.
Despite these enhancements, internal strife within ActBlue is evident, with at least seven senior officials reportedly departing recently. This turmoil, highlighted by The New York Times, reflects on the pressure the organization faces as investigations and media focus intensify.
As legislative actions take shape, Comer hinted at forthcoming developments, stating that substantial findings about ActBlue could emerge soon. When asked about a trail of foreign money, he confirmed, "Absolutely," signaling the breadth of the ongoing probe.
James Comer and Bryan Steil have vocalized frustrations over the Treasury's partial release of documents, urging for complete transparency. They referenced an essential commitment to cooperation and transparency from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant.
Steil pointed out potential future collaborations with the Department of Justice in holding those implicated in illegal activities related to election funding accountable. He highlighted that with potential administrative changes, further investigations could expand.
The Committees' actions are coupled with a broader concern for electoral integrity, emphasizing the necessity of addressing financial law violations. They underscored their duty to prevent any foreign actors from influencing American elections.
ActBlue has been a crucial element of fundraising efforts for Democratic and progressive campaigns. Despite its successful track record over two decades, the current scrutiny tests its operational resilience and trust within political circles.
