Don't Wait.
We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:
 May 11, 2024

CNN Analyst Surprised by Judge’s Decision To Allow Stormy Daniel's Testimony Which Prejudiced Jury

In a surprising turn of events, allegations have emerged suggesting the FBI may have planted evidence against former President Donald Trump, with potential bias from a judge as the 2024 election approaches.

The Blaze reported that this revelation could significantly sway public opinion and political dynamics during a critical election period.

Reports have surfaced accusing former President Donald Trump of being a victim of political persecution. CNN highlighted this scenario through comments made by a former U.S. District Court judge, pointing to possible judicial misconduct and bias in the handling of Trump's legal troubles.

The former judge expressed concerns about another judge's personal animosity towards Trump, suggesting that it influenced her judicial conduct. According to him, this bias was evident as she handled evidence irrelevant to Trump's case, aiming to sway the jury, particularly female jurors, against Trump.

Amid these accusations, the trial against Trump has been put on hold. Doubts about the legitimacy of key evidence, notably a photo labeled as 'top secret documents' found in Trump’s possession, prompted this suspension.

Media Outlets Question Integrity of Evidence

The contentious photo was prominently featured in major media outlets like the Washington Post and the New York Times.

It was later declared staged, raising questions about the authenticity of the evidence being presented in the high-profile case.

Sara Gonzales, reflecting on the unusual nature of CNN’s reporting, remarked on the network's candid coverage of these developments. Her comments underscored a moment of unexpected transparency in media often criticized for partiality.

Matthew Marsden echoed Gonzales’ sentiment, noting the public's surprise at the straightforwardness of CNN’s reporting. This incident highlights a broader distrust among the public towards media accuracy and fairness, especially in politically charged cases.

The trial’s postponement and the scrutiny of the evidence used against Trump have intensified debates about the integrity of the judicial process in politically sensitive cases. This situation has illuminated the complexities of legal battles involving high-profile figures.

The timing of these accusations and the trial’s suspension coincide with the run-up to the 2024 Presidential election, suggesting that political motives may be influencing the proceedings. This has led to widespread speculation about the potential impact on Trump’s political future and public perception.


The case against Donald Trump has unfolded amidst claims of fabricated evidence and judicial bias, capturing the attention of the nation.

The indefinite suspension of his trial, the controversy over the staged photo, and the candid remarks from media personalities like Sara Gonzales and Matthew Marsden paint a complex picture of the current political and judicial landscape. These developments continue to unfold, shaping the narratives that may influence the upcoming election.

Written By:
Christina Davie

Latest Posts

See All
Get news from American Digest in your inbox.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
© 2024 - The American Digest - All Rights Reserved