A stunning exposé unveils a coordinated effort by the Biden White House to weaponize the legal system against Donald Trump.
Breitbart reported that the book "Breaking the Law: Exposing the Weaponization of America’s Legal System Against Donald Trump" alleges a deliberate campaign to derail Trump’s political future. This alleged scheme, dubbed "lawfare," raises serious questions about the integrity of democratic processes.
The Biden administration is accused of orchestrating six major legal cases—four criminal and two civil—aimed at jailing or bankrupting Trump.
These cases, detailed in the book, reportedly consumed Trump’s time, focus, and resources. Each case is said to have direct ties to the White House, suggesting a calculated effort to sideline a political rival.
President Biden could have halted these legal actions, but chose not to intervene. This decision, critics argue, reflects a willingness to let partisan motives override fairness. The lack of action fuels suspicions of a politically driven agenda.
The Stormy Daniels case, mislabeled as a "hush money" affair, centered on falsifying business records and led to 34 felony convictions against Trump.
Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, who prosecuted the case, was funded by George Soros and campaigned on targeting Trump. Bragg’s claim of suing Trump over 100 times before his election was later debunked, casting doubt on his impartiality.
Judge Juan Merchan, who oversaw the case, donated to Biden’s campaign, an act deemed illegal for judicial officers. Merchan’s daughter, Loren, runs a firm that raised $93 million for Democrats in 2024, per a New York Post report. Trump called this "the greatest conflict of interest of all time," and it’s hard to argue otherwise when family ties and political cash intertwine.
Matthew Colangelo, Bragg’s lead prosecutor, left a senior DOJ role to join Bragg’s team, a move likened to a four-star general enlisting as a private.
Will Scharf, Trump’s attorney, noted the oddity of this demotion, which occurred shortly after a Biden press conference. The timing and Colangelo’s career shift raise eyebrows about White House influence.
In Georgia, the Fani Willis RICO case against Trump also shows troubling connections. Prosecutor Nathan Wade, Willis’s boyfriend and a family law attorney with no RICO experience, met with White House counsel for eight hours before Trump’s indictment. Appointing an unqualified ally without oversight reeks of favoritism and agenda-driven justice.
Willis herself met with Vice President Kamala Harris for five hours before the indictment, further tying the case to Biden’s inner circle.
Jeff DeSantis, a former Biden aide, served as a liaison between the White House and Willis’s office. These meetings suggest a coordinated effort, not a standalone prosecution.
Trump labeled these efforts "election interference at a level that nobody in this country has ever seen before." The web of White House connections in the Willis case makes his claim hard to dismiss outright. When prosecutors and political operatives huddle with top officials, justice starts looking like a chess game.
Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith as special counsel to investigate Trump, a decision later ruled unconstitutional. Smith, who staffed his team with Biden and Obama donors, had a conviction overturned by the Supreme Court in a prior case.
His appointment and subsequent office shutdown after 18 months highlight a pattern of overreach. The E. Jean Carroll defamation case, funded by Democrat megadonor Reid Hoffman, adds another layer to the lawfare narrative.
George Conway, an anti-Trump lawyer, sparked the lawsuit, and Hoffman, who visited the White House five times in 2022, openly vowed to spend heavily to defeat Trump. "Spend as much as I possibly can" isn’t the language of impartial justice—it’s a battle cry.
Trump remarked that even a legal titan like F. Lee Bailey couldn’t have saved him from the Carroll case’s bias. He claimed it was designed to "embarrass me," and the funding behind it supports his point. When megadonors bankroll lawsuits with White House access, the line between law and politics blurs.
New York AG Letitia James, who campaigned on targeting Trump, accused him of inflating assets in a civil case that yielded a nearly half-billion-dollar judgment. James, who visited the White House three times, boasted to Democrats about suing Trump daily. Her zeal, paired with zero victims or damages in the case, smells more like vendetta than justice.
Judge Arthur Engoron’s clerk, Allison Greenfield, was photographed with Sen. Chuck Schumer and donated to Democrats beyond New York’s ethics limits. Trump called her "Schumer’s girlfriend," alleging she eyed a federal judgeship under Biden. When court officials play political favorites, public trust in the system erodes.
No accountability has been delivered to those behind these alleged lawfare tactics, except by voters, the exposé notes. Congressional or Special Counsel investigations are recommended to uncover the full scope of this alleged conspiracy. Without such scrutiny, the weaponization of justice risks becoming a grim precedent for future elections.
