A recent exposé by Vanity Fair claims that Meghan Markle's team considered a "post-Harry divorce book" to remain in the public eye. This potential project follows a series of reportedly unsuccessful business endeavors by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
The exposé highlights Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's attempts to find footing outside royal life, scrutinizing their business ventures and media projects.
Rumors have surfaced that Markle's associates held informal talks with a publisher, though some insiders challenge the existence of a formal proposal.
The goal was reportedly to assess the level of interest in the potential book. A source reportedly involved in these discussions mentioned, “Meghan’s team had a conversation with a publishing house to gauge interest.”
Vanity Fair's piece explored the couple's various business trials, including their media efforts which have so far struggled to ignite. Since their move to the United States, both Harry and Markle have tried their hand at different projects, but with limited success.
They embarked on a significant media venture in 2020 when they signed a $20 million deal with Spotify. However, turning this investment into a successful podcast series was challenging.
Some ideas generated by the couple, such as interviews with controversial figures, were ultimately set aside. Additionally, their potential podcast intentions faced notable setbacks when both Beyoncé and Taylor Swift declined to participate.
The Vanity Fair article also sheds light on the alleged difficulties of collaborating with Meghan Markle. Accusations against her include instances of bullying behavior from her time working with various colleagues. Descriptions from several former associates painted a picture of a challenging work environment.
One individual described having worked with Markle as a taxing experience, explaining that it led to long-term therapy. Another former colleague provided insight into the dynamic, expressing frustration by stating, “It’s talking behind your back,” along with subtle forms of intimidation.
The examination of their post-royal life also encompasses their lifestyle brand efforts in California. After moving to Montecito, California, the couple purchased a luxurious $14 million home, attempting to establish themselves in the area.
There, they launched a lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard, which was met with skepticism from the local residents.
Montecito locals criticized this venture, claiming it lacked authenticity. A resident commented on the endeavor, referring to it as “kind of hucksterism” and added, “They moved away from England to get away from the scrutiny of the press, and all they do is try and get in the press in the United States.”
These revelations contribute to a broader narrative of challenging working conditions associated with Markle. One example mentioned was a collaborator on Markle’s “Archetypes” podcast, who took an extended leave of absence after just three episodes. Ultimately, this individual decided to leave the project entirely.
Observers note that Meghan Markle's apparent unwillingness to address personal flaws might be affecting public perception. In this turbulent period, her behavior has sparked conversations about professional ethics and personal responsibility.
The Duchess of Sussex's approach to media and branding has come under substantial scrutiny, with critiques that their pursuits occasionally lack a cohesive vision.
Another remark in the exposé describes them as seeking an overarching theme without possessing distinct ideas to support it. These challenges seem to underscore a broader struggle to define their identity in the public sphere.
The narrative surrounding their efforts does not overlook Prince Harry's involvement. His interests outside of the high-profile royal life appear to be limited, a point highlighted by a source questioning Harry’s passion beyond his known hobby of polo.
