Don't Wait.
We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:
 September 20, 2025

58 House Democrats vote against honoring Charlie Kirk after assassination

In a stunning display of partisan division, nearly five dozen House Democrats voted against a resolution to honor the life of Charlie Kirk, the assassinated founder of Turning Point USA.

The Daily Caller reported that this vote, while ultimately passing with strong bipartisan support, reveals a troubling undercurrent of ideological rigidity among some on the left. It begs the question: when did honoring a fallen patriot become a political football?

On Friday morning, September 12, 2025, the House passed a resolution with a 310-58 vote to commemorate Kirk’s legacy, though 58 Democrats stood in opposition, 38 voted “present,” and 22 didn’t even bother to cast a vote.

The tragedy began just two days earlier, on September 10, 2025, when Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old husband and father of two, was brutally assassinated during a speaking event at Utah Valley University.

Authorities have charged 22-year-old Tyler Robinson with aggravated murder, a capital offense, and reports indicate Robinson may have ties to far-left ideological circles. This horrific act of violence cut short the life of a man who dedicated himself to conservative principles and inspiring young Americans.

Partisan Divide Over Kirk’s Memorial Resolution

Following this shocking loss, the Senate moved swiftly, passing a similar resolution by unanimous consent earlier in the week of September 12, 2025. They also established a “National Day of Remembrance” for Kirk, to be observed annually on October 14, his birthday. It’s a fitting tribute to a figure who, love him or hate him, shaped political discourse with unapologetic vigor.

In the House, Speaker Mike Johnson, alongside 165 Republican lawmakers, introduced the resolution to honor Kirk’s contributions and condemn the violence that took his life.

The measure garnered support from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and his leadership team, who voiced approval in a closed-door meeting, though they refrained from directing their members on how to vote, per Axios reports. Still, the gesture of unity from some Democrats is a rare bright spot in an otherwise fractured response.

Yet, 58 House Democrats, including prominent figures like Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, rejected the resolution outright, citing their disagreement with Kirk’s political stances. Is this really the hill to die on—refusing to honor a murdered father of two because you didn’t like his views? It’s a sad commentary on the state of civility in our politics.

NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella didn’t hold back, stating, “The modern Democrat Party is simply too radical and unhinged to condemn a politically motivated assassination and honor a man and father of two whose only crime was loving America.”

His words sting with truth, as the refusal of nearly five dozen lawmakers to support this measure feels less like principled dissent and more like a petty jab at a fallen opponent. One wonders if ideology now trumps basic human decency.

Let’s be clear: Charlie Kirk was no stranger to controversy, championing conservative causes that often clashed with progressive ideals. But assassination isn’t debate—it’s a cowardly act that silences forever. Refusing to condemn such violence through a simple resolution sends a chilling message about where some stand on the value of free speech.

The resolution itself spoke to this very principle, declaring, “Such acts of politically motivated violence are antithetical to the principles of a free republic.”

It’s a reminder that our nation thrives on debate, not destruction, and that even those we disagree with deserve respect in death. To vote against this is to flirt with endorsing the very violence it condemns.

Honoring Kirk Amidst Political Discord

Kirk leaves behind a widow and two young children, a personal tragedy that should transcend political lines. Yet, while 310 lawmakers saw fit to honor his memory, the 58 dissenters and dozens more who dodged the vote entirely—38 voting “present” and 22 abstaining—cast a shadow over what should have been a unifying moment. It’s hard not to see this as a missed opportunity for healing.

Some might argue that Kirk’s views were too divisive to warrant such a tribute, but isn’t that the point of a free society—to tolerate and even defend the right to differing opinions? The Senate’s unanimous consent shows that agreement on this principle is possible, even in polarized times. Why, then, did so many House Democrats struggle to rise above?

The establishment of a “National Day of Remembrance” on Kirk’s birthday offers a chance to reflect on his impact, whether one admired or opposed him.

It’s a day to remember not just the man, but the ideals of discourse and debate he stood for, ideals that were violently stripped away. Let’s hope it serves as a wake-up call to prioritize unity over animosity.

At 31, Charlie Kirk had already built a legacy through Turning Point USA, energizing countless young conservatives to engage in the political arena. His assassination is a stark reminder of the dangers faced by public figures who dare to speak boldly in today’s charged climate. We can’t let such acts become normalized, no matter who the target is.

The split vote in the House, contrasted with the Senate’s unified stance, paints a troubling picture of where our political discourse stands.

While House Democratic leadership supported the resolution, their lack of guidance left room for dissent that feels more spiteful than substantive. It’s a moment that demands introspection from all sides.

Latest Posts

See All
Newsletter
Get news from American Digest in your inbox.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, https://staging.americandigest.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
© 2025 - The American Digest - All Rights Reserved