July 4, 2022

Nancy Pelosi names first female chaplain of the House

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has officially named Rear Admiral Margaret Grun Kibben as the first female chaplain to ever serve in either chamber of Congress. 

Pelosi called the nomination “historic” in her Thursday announcement, adding that “Kibben brings decades of decorated experience in the military and the ministry, as a retired Rear Admiral who served as the U.S. Navy’s Chief Chaplain and the chaplain of the Marine Corps.”

“Her integrity, experience and patriotism will serve the Congress and the Country well, as she ministers to the needs of Members,” Pelosi continued.

Pelosi thanked outgoing Reverend Patrick Conroy for his service, remarking that “Father Pat Conroy has been a blessing to Members on both sides of the aisle.”

“Throughout his service, Father Pat fulfilled the calling of St. Ignatius of Loyola: ‘for the greater glory of God.’ His service has been a spiritual and moral anchor for Members, grounding our institution in the values of faith and country and reminding our Members of our responsibilities to our great nation and constituents,” she concluded. “All Members wish Father Pat well as he enjoys his well-deserved retirement from the House.”

Kibben has had a long and distinguished career as a chaplain, previously serving as the Navy’s chief chaplain and the chaplain of the Marine Corps.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
0 0 votes
Article Rating

This is a demo advert, you can use simple text, HTML image or any Ad Service JavaScript code. If you're inserting HTML or JS code make sure editor is switched to 'Text' mode.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Daniel R Smith Sr (@guest_1095819)
1 year ago


Barney Whittle (@guest_1095825)
Reply to  Daniel R Smith Sr
1 year ago

Is she wearing a hijab?

Former Marine (@guest_1095830)
Reply to  Daniel R Smith Sr
1 year ago

Not for her but can be controlled by her like all good communist . she needs to retire before she is forced to retire .

rm (@guest_1096197)
Reply to  Former Marine
1 year ago

I would care less if I picked up the morning paper and read that Nancy Pelosi caught the coronavirus with a terminal result… Prayers answered…

Former Marine (@guest_1095823)
1 year ago

Blasphemous person because she does not follow God’s teaching but has a communistic mantra .

Larry (@guest_1095837)
1 year ago

She must be a Corrupt and Crooked Bible Thumper

Gary m (@guest_1096054)
Reply to  Larry
1 year ago

Hey! everybody take it easy, Pelosi needs all the God thumping she can get. She hasn’t had any god for a long time, and she needs someone to help her repent her sins. I am afraid it will take a few centuries, but we can always hope for the best. Not to mention the rest of the demonicrats in the house, that live in those things called rat holes, that need all of the God that they can get.

Christina Creasy (@guest_1095860)
1 year ago

Pelosi is a hypocrite and her wanting this woman as Chaplin makes me wonder if she is as corrupt as the Democrats are

Theodore (@guest_1095961)
Reply to  Christina Creasy
1 year ago

Yah, something is definitely Rotten in DC.

Renee Palmer (@guest_1095988)
1 year ago

Not Bad, these Chaplain’s, FOUR Year’s Ago MADE $ 1, 600 P E R PRAYER !!, that can make them M$LL$)NA$RES !! case they can Request , many time’s a Day, NOT Just To Open With Prayer !! More ” PORK ” FROM THE TAX-PAYER !!
They Spend Like Drunken Sailor’s … LIKE, THEY Nave NO, O V E R S I G H T………

rm (@guest_1096198)
Reply to  Renee Palmer
1 year ago

I would rather see US chaplains get the money rather than peeing it away on foreign aid and queer studies like the last pork ridden stimulus bill….

Gary m (@guest_1096055)
1 year ago

I just had an idea on gun control, conservatives will love this. All gun violence is committed in the blue state cities. So, what I purpose is to confiscate all weapons in these cities. Anyone with a gun of any kind will be shot on sight, including police. although I don’t know who will shot them if the police don’t have guns. Guess we’ll cross that bridge when err…. we get there. Always got to be a problem.

Gary m (@guest_1096058)
1 year ago

I hear that the regular dems want to start a new party. With out the radical leftists. They want a democratic party that they recognize. They don’t like all of this social BS that the communists are trying to shove down their throat. They think that the communists should have started their own party instead of trying to hi-jack theirs. They think people like AOC and the squids are not democrats they are commies that have use the democrat party to conceal what their real agenda is, and get democrats to support them before they know what they are. Now the democrats must reorganize a new party, and leave the radicals to rot on the vine.

S.L. (@guest_1096101)
Reply to  Gary m
1 year ago

I agree about another Democratic party, however, to make it a legitimate party they need to sign allegiance to the US constitution and that they promise to work for the people not the radical lying POS Democrats and communists that are currently running their stupid games against the citizens of our country. Also, revoke the citizenship of the squad and George Soros.

Gary m (@guest_1096059)
1 year ago

The main part of the Supreme Court’s job is OVERSIGHT, and if someone or some state is violating the constitution, then the court should step in, whether there is a complaint or brief filed in a lower court or the high court directly. If the court is not doing this, then the court is not doing the due diligence it is suppose to do, to protect the constitution. And if the court is not going to do its job, then it is up to we the people to do the job, and if we have to do the job then we just as well fire the court, we are the only ones that can. It makes no difference if a judge is conservative or liberal if the judge does not follow the constitution. The constitution was not put there to protect the administration, the legislature, or the court, it was put there to protect we the people, from the government period, by putting in guide lines for the government to follow. When the government does not want to follow, then we the people have the right and the power to change or remove the government. I think that the court gets so tongue tied with the literal meaning of the law that it forgets what the most important part of its job is. OVERSIGHT.

Since officials in a number of states have taken it upon themselves to make laws with out the legislative bodies in those states, that the constitution gives the legislative bodies the power to do. They are ignoring the constitution, and need to be reigned in. It is past time for the SCROTUS to do its due diligence, and step in, if the SCROTUS does not wish to do so, then we the people will have to do the job of the court, and we will not need the court.
Liberals think that they can change the laws just by wishing it, and that is wrong. That is the way kings, queens, tyrants, and dictators rule. and that is why our forefathers wrote the constitution, to keep the corrupt from getting in power in government. That is why we have come to the point of needing to set term limits and to remove immunity that protects those that would try to abuse their position by creating greater transparency in the government.

Just like they did with the Hunter Biden scandal, the fake news and the media, are covering up what states are doing to hide the evidence. It is not only in the so-called battle ground states. The governors and judges, and election officials in these states, are violating the law and the constitution of the United States, by making laws illegally, and suppressing the evidence, by refusing to allow ballots, and machines to be investigated. As much as I hate to say this the Supreme Court is condoning this behavior, by not enforcing the constitution. This is their job, to protect the constitution by enforcing it. The Supreme Courts job of oversight does not end because a case is not filed in a lower court. There is nothing in the constitution that says the Supreme Court it’s self cannot call on the DOJ or Superior Court to take action on such matters, and for it not to do so is negligence. As I have said before and will repeat.
The constitution was not put there to protect the administration, the legislature, or the court, it was put there to protect we the people, from the government, by putting in guide lines for the government to follow.


U.S. Code Section 242 of Title 18, Deprivation of rights under color of law, makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties.

Some states have gotten the idea that they can just change laws because they want to. However that is not the case, when a state becomes a state they sign on to the constitution and the bill of rights, and all of the laws contained with in the constitution. These are the over riding laws of the land, and apply to all states, and can not be just dismissed out of hand by any state governor, state legislature, or any state official, or local officials. It does not work that way. The constitution and the bill of rights can not be changed by any government body be it federal state or local. Changes to the constitution and the bill of rights can only be made by we the people. Not with E.O. or legislation by any governing body, or any whim of someone on the supreme court. This is to keep government from usurping the power of the people.

Santospal (@guest_1189498)
1 year ago

http://zithromaxproff.com/# azithromycin zithromax
zithromax 500 mg

Billyamopy (@guest_1194694)
1 year ago

buy clindamycin generic: chloramphenicol capsules
buy ketoconazole

ClaudFag (@guest_1212669)
1 year ago

order amoxicillin uk: cheap amoxicillin – can you buy amoxicillin over the counter canada

Jamesnet (@guest_1220977)
1 year ago

can i buy ventolin online mexico: blue albuterol inhaler – where can i buy ventolin in uk

Elberthiepe (@guest_1261637)
1 year ago

prinivil 2.5 mg: lisinopril generic – generic lisinopril online



Sign Up For The Daily Newsletter


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x