May 6, 2021

Nancy Pelosi has already broken her own rules banning gendered language in the House

The left’s gender ideology is insane and nonsensical. For that reason, even the people who make the idiotic rules can’t comply.

Case in point, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) publically fell flat on her face by violating her own ridiculous proposed rules against using gendered language on the floor Wednesday. “I stand before you as a wife, a mother, a grandmother, a daughter,” she said during the debate over the latest impeachment effort against President Donald Trump.

Previously, Pelosi and her party presented a resolution to strike any kind of gendered language from the chamber in the new rules for the 117th Congress. For instance, instead of “mother” or “father,” the preference would be for “parent,” while a “sister” or “brother” should be called “sibling.” Also, titles such as “chairman” would be changed to “chair” for a neutral approach.

Almost immediately, these rules were skewered by conservatives who poked fun at the absurdity of it. “This is stupid. Signed, A father, son, and brother,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) tweeted.

This obsession with banishing gender drove Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) to close a prayer on the floor with  “Amen and a-woman.” Besides being embarrassingly pandering, it was completely nonsensical. As Daily Wire host Ben Shapiro pointed out in his Jan. 4 podcast, the root of the word “has literally nothing to do with gender,” and actually comes through from Hebrew. Shapiro ridiculed Cleaver for his ignorance and the ridiculousness in pursuit of political correctness, calling it “the stupidest thing that I have heard in all my life.”

These nitpicky lingual prohibitions are meant for inclusivity but are often clunky and unnatural. For Pelosi, she had to break her own rules during her rant that was simply political theater disguised as political action in the latest impeachment against Trump.

After the attack on the U.S. Capitol last week, Democrats have been singularly-focused on publicly punishing Trump. While it was true that the altercation involved a group of his supporters, Trump never ordered it or even condoned their actions. Regardless of the facts, Pelosi and the left have run with the narrative that he incited the attack and have used it to destroy the president in the waning days of his administration.

The speaker used the verboten gendered language because it’s how regular people speak and because it made her plea seem more human and impassioned. The insane rules about language the left have created are all for show and make no sense in light of reality — just like the impeachment she was there to push.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

105 Responses

  1. Polsei need to be removed from Office,she has held America hostage for way to long ,All out of the Hate she has for OUR PRESIDENT TRUMP,Who will be again our President !!!! Watch what God is about to do !!!!

    1. She really is not thinking rationally. The American people deserve better than she is able to give. Apparently, she is hate-filled and not thinking rationally. The people deserve much better!! All those months she deliberately held those stimulus checks back to spite President Trump, speaks volumes about her.

    1. None of the rules they make apply to the supposed elitists they think they are. Their motto is rules are for thee but not for me has been obvious for decades.

  2. Webster Dictionary should simply change the definition of the word idiot to say NANCY PELOSI and the word crook to BIDEN.

  3. PEOPLE GET OVER IT HE SHE WE MOM DAD TO TRY AND GET RID OF THE GENDER IS LIKE PATCHING A DAM WITH GUM IT AINT GONNA STICK PEOPLE HAVE NAMES USE THEIR NAME OR MAM SIR AND TELL THEM IF UPSET PULL UP THE ADULT PANTIES AND DEAL WITH IT OR GET OVER IT AND MOVE ON TO THINGS MORE IMPORTANT LIFE THREATNING ISSUES

  4. The main part of the Supreme Court’s job is OVERSIGHT, and if someone or some state is violating the constitution, then the court should step in, whether or not there is a complaint or brief filed in a lower court or the high court directly. If the court is not doing this, then the court is not doing the due diligence it is suppose to do, to protect the constitution. And if the court is not going to do its job, then it is up to we the people to do the job, and if we have to do the job then we just as well fire the court, we are the only ones that can. It makes no difference if a judge is conservative or liberal if the judge does not follow the constitution. The constitution was not put there to protect the administration, the legislature, or the court, it was put there to protect we the people, from the government period, by putting in guide lines for the government to follow. When the government does not want to follow, then we the people have the right and the power to change or remove the government. I think that the court gets so tongue tied with the literal meaning of the law that it forgets what the most important part of its job is. OVERSIGHT.

    Since officials in a number of states have taken it upon themselves to make laws with out the legislative bodies in those states, that the constitution gives the legislative bodies the power to do. They are ignoring the constitution, and need to be reigned in. It is past time for the SCROTUS to do its due diligence, and step in, if the SCROTUS does not wish to do so, then we the people will have to do the job of the court, and we will not need the court.
    Liberals think that they can change the laws just by wishing it, and that is wrong. That is the way kings, queens, tyrants, and dictators rule. and that is why our forefathers wrote the constitution, to keep the corrupt from getting in power in government. That is why we have come to the point of needing to set term limits and to remove immunity that protects those that would try to abuse their position by creating greater transparency in the government.

    Just like they did with the Hunter Biden scandal, the fake news and the media, are covering up what states are doing to hide the evidence. It is not only in the so-called battle ground states. The governors and judges, and election officials in these states, are violating the law and the constitution of the United States, by making laws illegally, and suppressing the evidence, by refusing to allow ballots, and machines to be investigated. As much as I hate to say this the Supreme Court is condoning this behavior, by not enforcing the constitution. This is their job, to protect the constitution by enforcing it. The Supreme Courts job of oversight does not end because a case is not filed in a lower court. There is nothing in the constitution that says the Supreme Court it’s self cannot call on the DOJ or Superior Court to take action on such matters, and for it not to do so is negligence.
    As I have said before and will repeat.
    ——————————————————————————————————————————–
    Liberals think that they can change the laws just by wishing it, and that is wrong. That is the way kings, queens, tyrants, and dictators rule.

    The constitution was not put there to protect the administration, the legislature, or the court, it was put there to protect we the people, from the government, by putting in guide lines for the government to follow.

    WE DON’T NEED MORE GOVERNMENT, WE NEED TO CONTROL THE GOVERNMENT WE HAVE.
    ——————————————————————————————————————————–
    U.S. Code Section 242 of Title 18, Deprivation of rights under color of law, makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
    For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties.

    Some states have gotten the idea that they can just change laws because they want to. However that is not the case, when a state becomes a state they sign on to the constitution and the bill of rights, and all of the laws contained with in the constitution. These are the over riding laws of the land, and apply to all states, and can not be just dismissed out of hand by any state governor, state legislature, or any state official, or local officials. It does not work that way. The constitution and the bill of rights can not be changed by any government body be it federal state or local. Changes to the constitution and the bill of rights can only be made by we the people. Not with E.O. or legislation by any governing body, or any whim of someone on the supreme court. This is to keep government from usurping the power of the people.

    The supreme Court is “appointed” to oversee the implementation of the constitution, and the protection of the constitution, by enforcing the constitution.
    Lately it would seem that the Supreme Court is neglecting its role of oversight, and enforcement. Which means it is not protecting the constitution.

    The Supreme Court is being negligent in its duty of oversight, of a number of states that have violated the constitution, by letting officials make laws illegally, instead of the legislatures in those states. This falls squarely in the scope of the Supreme Court. Whether or not any complaint has been filed in any other court or the Supreme Court Directly. This is the job of the Supreme Court in its roll of oversight, in the protection of the constitution. I am sorely disappointed by the Supreme Courts actions or lack there of, to do what is necessary to protect the constitution and thereby the country and the people. Trump thought he appointed three conservatives to the Supreme Court, I think he guessed wrong.

  5. Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg and Brian Stelters and George Soros, and Mike Bloomberg and their freedom of speech is the biggest threat to democracy. All they do is spew vile hate all day long, they think that caring about another is a criminal act. I have to wonder if they care about their mothers, I kind of doubt it. Anyone that spews that kind of hate can’t really care about anybody, not even their mothers. Jesus would be horrified to learn of this. He would be horrified to know that after making their fortunes off of this country, they have turned on it.

  6. These Democrats should change the name of their party to the Dimwit Party. When I heard that imbecile say “Amen” and “A woman” at the podium I laughed out loud. How could anybody in Congress be that stupid and get elected. It says a lot about the morons who voted for him. Maybe he should change his name from Emmanuel Cleaver to Beaver Cleaver.

  7. Gary M……………………WELL SAID……….ROBERTS ESPECIALLY OUGHT TO READ AND RE READ YOUR POST……………….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

OUR TWEETS

PRESIDENT'S TWEETS

Sign Up For The Daily Newsletter

SYNDICATED NEWS