June 15, 2021

Glessner: Conservative-majority Supreme Court to take on critical abortion challenge

News last week that the U.S. Supreme Court would hear arguments in a potentially pivotal abortion case sent shock waves through liberal circles, and according to pro-life advocate Thomas Glessner, the matter offers the court’s conservative wing a prime opportunity to overturn a central aspect of Roe V. Wade once and for all.

The case of Thomas Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health asks the justice to determine whether Mississippi’s 2018 Gestational Age Act – a statute that bans abortion after 15 weeks – is indeed constitutional, with a central question centering on the point in time at which a fetus has achieved “viability.”

Glessner, founder and president of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, writes in an op-ed for the Washington Examiner that now is the time for the court to put an end to the sort of abortion on demand engendered by Roe in 1973 and acknowledge that a pregnancy’s so-called “viability” is an unacceptable – and increasingly irrelevant – measure of an unborn child’s humanity.

As Glessner points out, in Roe, the justices held that prohibiting abortion prior to a pregnancy’s viability – the point at which a baby can live outside the womb – amounted to an “undue burden” on a mother’s right to abortion, and that analysis has remained the prevailing standard for assessing the constitutionality of potential restrictions on abortion to the present day.

However, Glessner argues, “viability is not a measurement of the humanity of an individual. Rather, it is a measurement of the state of medical technology,” providing examples of an astronaut on the moon requiring a spacesuit for survival and a deep-sea diver needed an oxygen tank in order to live and arguing that such individuals may not be technically “viable” without external assistance, but are no less human.

The holding in Roe pegged viability outside the womb as occurring at 24 weeks gestational age, but as Glessner points out, advances in medicine have altered that time frame considerable in recent decades, making it possible for babies to survive much earlier than in the past.

In authoring the opinion in Roe, Glessner notes, Justice Harry Blackmun offered a “curious and illogical” rationale for using “viability” as a determinant of when abortion is permissible, saying that it represented a point in time at which a child is “capable of meaningful life outside the womb.”

Glessner argues that such a standard is problematic in that it means that “human life cannot be protected by the law unless it is ‘meaningful,’” and proceeds to ask whether the lives of a handicapped newborn or an adult who becomes a quadriplegic are “meaningful,” given that those individuals would require artificial means and external assistance to continue.

Should the justices uphold Mississippi’s statutory abortion restrictions in this case, Glessner says, all states will be free to ban abortion entirely and Roe will “take its deserved place in the ash heaps of history.” With six conservative justices now on the bench, he asserts, chances are stronger than ever that the country “can seize this opportunity to fulfill its promise to future generations that we stand for liberty and justice for all.”

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

9 Responses

  1. Here is Job opportunity for everyone! Because of Corona Work from comfort of your home, on your computer And you can work with your own working hours. You can work this job As part time or As A full time job. You can Earns up to $1000 per Day by way of work is simple on the web. It’s easy, just follow instructions on home page,

    read it carefully from start to finish Check The Details…… http://www.works91.com

    1. You know, that saying, “MY BODY MY CHOICE” is so wrong in so many ways. It’s a baby that is being eliminated but if that saying is correct and the SCOTUS goes with it then hear me out. Why can’t an elderly person, let say over 65 or 70 walk into a clinic, sign a few forms and end their lives in a painless, peaceful manner?? Why do we have to wait for a devastating illness, sickness that will cause financial problems and dependency on others to eat, go to the bathroom, bath and so on till the end?? That’s not right.

    2. [ STAY AT HOME & WORK AT HOME ]
      Start making money this time… Spend more time with your family & relatives by doing jobs that only require you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $25,000 to $30,000 a month. I’ve started this job and earn a handsome income and now I am exchanging it with you, so you can do it too.

      You can check it out here……….—–>>>> http://www.newapp7.com

  2. I disagree you see you do not have vision i believe Roe will be over turned. Let me state this all of you that wants abortion is commiting a grave sin and will be punished by God when you finally come face to face with God. It’s judgement day for all of us. So repent ask a priest to hear your confession and ask him to forgive you of your sins.

  3. Can this money be ear marked for lobotomies to increase the IQ ratio in liberal districts? Since liberalism is a mental disorder, anything we can do to cure this sickness is a benefit to all mankind.

  4. I get paid over $190 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 15k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless.
    HERE ➤➤ https://www.workapp2.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OUR TWEETS

PRESIDENT'S TWEETS

Sign Up For The Daily Newsletter

SYNDICATED NEWS