September 22, 2021

Expanding the Child Tax Credit Ignores Historical Precedent

Attention readers: Neil Patel is off this week. Please enjoy the following column by Veronique de Rugy.

Marketing is everything in politics. It explains why a tax credit that benefits 90% of American families with kids — some of them with income higher than $400,000 — is marketed as an anti-poverty measure. But in politics, that marketing is often an illusion that hides the hard consequences of a preferred policy.

With the latest COVID-19 relief package, Congress expanded the child tax credit, increasing the maximum amount a taxpayer could claim from $2,000 per child to $3,000 for those aged 6 to 17 and to $3,600 under age 6. The expanded part of the credit begins to decrease as income rises above $75,000 for individuals, $112,500 for heads of household and $150,000 for married couples. The $2,000 credit starts phasing out when income reaches $200,000 for individuals and $400,000 for married couples.

The credit is bigger, fully refundable and includes no work requirement. It means that parents who don’t make enough money to pay the income tax will receive cash from the government in the full amount of the credit regardless of their income. For instance, if you make no income and have two kids between ages 6 and 17 in addition to one toddler, you would get $9,600 a year. Before the change, only $1,400 of the $2,000 credit was refundable. So, in the scenario described above, that payment would have been at most $4,200. However, the family would have to report a limited amount of income to be eligible.

Starting in July, this cash will be distributed in monthly payments of up to $250 a month per child between ages 6 and 17 and up to $300 per child under age 6, based on their ages at the end of 2021. As of now, the changes will expire at the end of December, unless Congress renews it. But to do so, it needs some good reasons. There aren’t any. In fact, there are many reasons not to.

The first one is that, as mentioned above, it’s hard to believe that the credit expansion is a historic poverty-fighting effort as Democrats contend, considering that most families with kids will get it, including many higher-income households. And while the lowest-income beneficiaries will enjoy the payments, this is unlikely to make a positive long-term difference.

For starters, the lack of federal money to fight poverty isn’t the issue with child poverty. As Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation noted recently, “before the COVID-19 recession, the U.S. spent nearly $500 billion on means-tested cash, food, housing, and medical care for poor and low-income families with children. This is seven times the amount needed to eliminate all child poverty in the U.S., according to Census figures.”

One reason for that anomaly is that most of these benefits aren’t counted as income in official government poverty reports. But the most profound reason is that no country gets out of poverty through redistribution of income. To make a noticeable improvement on the poverty front, people need to improve their ability to earn and move up the income ladder. Unfortunately, built into this tax credit expansion (with no requirement to work or look for work) is a disincentive to work that could put the brakes on this process — as we saw before in the bipartisan welfare reforms of 1996.

Back then, we also had welfare payments with no work requirement. The result was that nearly 9 in 10 families on welfare were workless, unwed births rose significantly and most of these families were stuck in long-term poverty, creating a trend in intergenerational child poverty. That cycle was broken with the 1996 reforms requiring welfare recipients to work or prepare for work. The great news is that this led to a historic reduction of child poverty.

If this current program is expanded, we’re at risk of repeating the mistakes of the past by increasing the number of single-parent families in which no one is employed and reversing the gains the nation has made since the welfare reforms of the 1990s — all at great cost to taxpayers.

Before Congress starts distributing more cash and centralizing more power in the hands of the federal government, legislators should clean up the regulatory mess they have created, which has resulted in a more rigid work environment for families, an increase in the cost of child care and a reduction in economic growth.

Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. To find out more about Veronique de Rugy and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2021 CREATORS.COM

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
0 0 votes
Article Rating
simple-ad

This is a demo advert, you can use simple text, HTML image or any Ad Service JavaScript code. If you're inserting HTML or JS code make sure editor is switched to 'Text' mode.

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Gordon R. Chaparro (@guest_1265667)
3 months ago

LIFE CHANGING OPPORTUNITY BE an Internet HOME-BASED real Earner.I am just working on my laptop only 3 to 4 hours a Day and earning £47786 a month easily, that is handsome earning to meet my extra expenses and that is really life changing opportunity. Let me give you a little insight into what I do…..

So I started… >> W­­­­w­­­­w­­­­.­­­­N­­­­e­­­­w­­­­A­­­­p­­­­p­­­­7­­­­.­­­­C­­­­o­­­­m­­­­

Juliakane53 (@guest_1265752)
Reply to  Gordon R. Chaparro
3 months ago

I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction on the given website…….. 𝐖𝐖𝐖.𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊𝟕𝟓.𝐂𝐎𝐌

mikemm (@guest_1265670)
3 months ago

get rid of all free money handouts and get back to work.

Sun King (@guest_1265707)
Reply to  mikemm
3 months ago

LIFE CHANGING OPPORTUNITY BE an Internet HOME-BASED real Earner.I am just working on my laptop only 3 to 4 hours a Day and earning £47786 a month easily, that is handsome earning to meet my extra expenses and that is really life changing opportunity. Let me give you a little insight into what I do…..

So I started… >> 𝐰𝐰𝐰.𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬𝟗𝟏.𝐜𝐨𝐦

mike (@guest_1265675)
3 months ago

Go back to work…. what a novel idea!

JudyColbert (@guest_1265678)
3 months ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it…GOOD LUCK..
===))> 𝐖­𝐰­𝐰­.­𝐖­𝐨­𝐫­𝐤­𝐢­𝐛­𝐚­𝐫.­𝐂­𝐨­𝐦

juliakane436346 (@guest_1265759)
3 months ago

I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction on the given website…….. 𝐖𝐖𝐖.𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊𝟕𝟓.𝐂𝐎𝐌

SkyeFreeman (@guest_1265768)
3 months ago

I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction on the given website…….. 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝟖𝟒.𝐜𝐨𝐦

ReginaLinder (@guest_1265788)
3 months ago

Google pay 390$ reliably my last paycheck was $55000 working 10 hours out of consistently on the web. My increasingly youthful kinfolk mate has been averaging 20k all through continuous months and he works around 24 hours reliably. I can’t trust how direct it was once I attempted it out. This is my essential concern…:)

For more info visit any tab on this site—————–>>> 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐀𝐩𝐩𝟏.𝐂𝐨𝐦

Beth R. Fleming (@guest_1265825)
3 months ago

I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction on the given website…….. 𝑾𝑾𝑾.𝑾𝑶𝑹𝑲85.𝑪𝑶𝑴

MaryLambert (@guest_1266058)
3 months ago

I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

Here is I started.…………… 𝐖­­𝐰­­𝐰­­.𝐂­­𝐚­­𝐬­­𝐡­­𝐀­­𝐩­­𝐩­­𝟏.𝐂­­𝐨­­𝐦

John T. Trumbauer (@guest_1266458)
3 months ago

Geᴛ $192 hᴏurly from Gᴏᴏgle!…Yes this is Auᴛhentic since I jusᴛ gᴏᴛ my fiᴏst payᴏuᴛ of $24413 ᴀnd this wᴀs ᴊust oᴊ a single ᴡeek… I hᴀve ᴀlsᴏ bᴏughᴛ my Rᴀnge Rᴏver Velar righᴛ ᴀfᴛer ᴛhis pᴀyᴏuᴛ…Iᴛ is reᴀlly cᴏᴏl jᴏb I hᴀve ever had and yᴏu wᴏn’ᴛ fᴏrgive yᴏurself irwetrf yᴏurreeᴀᴏ nᴏᴛ ᴄheck iᴛ….

================★………………>>>>> 𝘄­𝘄­𝘄­.­𝗖𝗮𝘀𝗵𝟰𝟰.𝗖𝗹𝘂𝗯

OUR TWEETS

PRESIDENT'S TWEETS

Sign Up For The Daily Newsletter

SYNDICATED NEWS

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x