May 20, 2022

Elevate Your Thinking

Attention readers: Adriana Cohen is off this week. Please enjoy the following column by Jackie Gingrich Cushman.

If you’ve seen the signs reading, “Science is real,” heard the phrase, “follow the science” or been told to “trust in science,” and if these statements have often been used to try to curb your dissent, free thinking and discussion — then elevate your thinking. These statements are the opposite of scientific inquiry, which is the process of hypothesizing, testing and knowing that the answer is often that the hypothesis is wrong but the free flow of ideas is important to the advancement of knowledge.

This blind trust and required following ignores the fact that science changes over time. If this were not so, we would still be bleeding patients in order to get rid of the diseases that were invading their bodies. Bloodletting was used for thousands of years. In 1799, when our first president, George Washington, was feeling bad, he “asked to be bled the next day, and physicians drained an estimated 5 to 7 pints in less than 16 hours,” according to He died a few days later. Guessing you would prefer not to have 5 to 7 pints drained from you if you woke up with a sore throat and felt a bit off.

My point is that doctors practice medicine, and even if they are employing the latest medical breakthrough, there is always more that will be discovered later. Additionally, some supposed scientific solutions might have outcomes that are actually bad — but we don’t realize it until later. For example, in the mid-1900s, the drug thalidomide was designed as a risk-free sedative and then prescribed to help pregnant women with morning sickness in the U.K. As a result, some children were born with serious birth defects.

Thalidomide was eventually taken off the market for morning sickness. In retrospect, the medicine should not have been prescribed to pregnant women.

Let’s look at a more recent example. Last spring, Dr. Anthony Fauci said that masks were not needed for the general public to protect them from COVID-19. He later let us know that his statement was not true, but that it had been issued to ensure enough masks were available to protect healthcare workers. It was only after supplies increased that masks were recommended for the general public. In many places, one is now required to wear a mask to enter. Last month, Dr. Fauci said that two masks are better than one. This might be true, but then four might be even better than two. Will we soon be required to wear two or four masks to shop?

While we might like the concept that we can rely on science, and we might find solace in fixed information, we should understand that science is ever-evolving. This is good in that there are more medical and biotech breakthroughs that change people’s lives for the better.

My sister Kathy has rheumatoid arthritis. For years, she suffered debilitating pain and watched as her joints became twisted. There were days she could not get out of bed. Her use of Enbrel, a biologic, has changed her life. Her RA is arrested, and she has finished several marathons and raised over $270,000 for the Arthritis Foundation to further research.

Eventually, there will be even better medicines, different approaches and new discoveries, and potentially even ways to prevent RA from occurring. While we might like to believe in science as the truth, it might be better to think of it as the truth at a point in time, based on a particular perspective.

This week, MC Hammer tweeted this: “If science is a ‘commitment to truth’ shall we site all the historical non-truths perpetuated by scientists ? Of course not. It’s not science vs Philosophy … It’s Science + Philosophy. Elevate your Thinking and Consciousness. When you measure include the measurer.” His tweet, which went viral, was a response to @drewgrey’s tweet: “Philosophy is flirtation with ideas. Science is commitment to truth.”

Let’s go back to the pandemic response. Mask, double mask, close businesses, get rid of social interactions, stay away from others, social distance and close schools. While these actions might have limited the spread, they also resulted in a long list of side effects. We know people are social creatures and that isolation impacts mental health. While online learning might prevent people from becoming infected, it also often slows learning. Parents are unable to attend to their work while also attending to their children, and businesses being shuttered eventually leads to economic decline.

When you measure, include the measurer. Elevate your thinking to include more points of view, more perspectives and possibilities. Think, and do not agree reflexively. In real life, there are often many more implications, interactions and potential tragic results that may occur.

To find out more about Jackie Gingrich Cushman, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
0 0 votes
Article Rating

This is a demo advert, you can use simple text, HTML image or any Ad Service JavaScript code. If you're inserting HTML or JS code make sure editor is switched to 'Text' mode.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

JOE (@guest_1159662)
1 year ago

I’ve been on renamed thalidomide for over four years for multiple myeloma and have it to thank for being alive and active.
sometimes a bad initial drug can later prove a Godsend in a different area

Sharon C King (@guest_1159703)
1 year ago

Great insights! I agree totally 🙂
Thanks for sharing, hopefully “Scientists, Doctors, Health Care Essential staff, politicians/Fauci” will be more open-minded; moving forward !

Heinrich (@guest_1159705)
1 year ago

Mss. Jackie Gingrich Cuahman. Thank You very much! Bleeding is not for me. Science is real! Follow the science and be told trust in Science!
I’am happy living 2021. There are, like Fauci, He makes statement and than – flib and flub! But He get’s PAID! China they have the cure, why there is no outbreaks in China!

WVRidgeRunner (@guest_1159894)
Reply to  Heinrich
1 year ago

Do not believe China, they have outbreaks, they also have the Chinese Communist Party to stop the median from revealing how many. Also if the truth is known and the CDC is correct there have only been 16000 deaths in the US from this COVID.

George (@guest_1159920)
1 year ago

The point is, you may be able to trust the science within limits but don’t trust the scientist (Dr. Fauci). The scientist has more than one vested interest in his interpretation of the science. When President Trump brought up to subject of the successes that some European countries were having with the drug hydroxychloroquine, Fauci was the one who down played the effectiveness of the drug. Why? Perhaps the fact that he had a vested interest in the development of a new more costly drug. How much has he invested in the businesses that were working to develop a new drug? He also had a political interest in not giving in to the president. He was playing both sides of the issue. So while we ay be able to trust the science as we know it today, we can’t always trust the “scientist” presenting the story.

Gail Denham (@guest_1160888)
Reply to  George
1 year ago

for goodness sake, don’t trust that publicity hungry man fauci – he has his fingers in the beginning of this whole thing, from what I understand.
he is paid more than the president also (I think I heard) but the point is – he GUESSES – and he manipulates the truth big time.

let him wear his three masks – ha! – I’ll bet he has his escapes

and we all should ESCAPE – use our brains to protect us and other s- but be free – open businesses – restuarants – schools, kids are suffering – and all because of that very self-centered man who CALLS HIMSELF a scientist. no, I think he has political connections big time. let’s listen to doctors who have treated the disease and who are now treating. they know the truth.

James Jacobs (@guest_1159991)
1 year ago

Science is considered true until someone proves it wrong. Like the earth is flat. Like man descended from the ape. I think it was the other way around, I have seen more people acting like apes than I have apes acting like people.

Lauren A Wallace (@guest_1160038)
1 year ago

The negroes are descendent of the Apes. Look at their facial features and hair. The truth will set them free.

Lydia Cummings (@guest_1161088)
1 year ago

I would not give a wooden nickel for Dr. Fauci’s opinions or advice! He talks out of both sides of his mouth.
Lydia C.



Sign Up For The Daily Newsletter


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x