August 2, 2021

Can the Biden Administration Stop China?

The acrid atmosphere last week at the Captain Cook Hotel in Anchorage, Alaska, with its vivid murals of the 18th-century British seafarer James Cook’s discoveries throughout the Pacific, sounds very much like the acrid atmosphere almost exactly 60 years ago in the Beaux-Arts American and Soviet embassies in Vienna: grim, at least for the United States.

Vienna was where the 42-year-old President John Kennedy met the 67-year-old Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, who, as Kennedy, told The New York Times’ James Reston immediately afterward, “beat the hell” out of him.

We don’t know whether Secretary of State Antony Blinken and national security adviser Jake Sullivan felt the same way about their treatment by their Chinese counterparts, Foreign Secretary Wang Yi and foreign affairs chief Yang Jiechi. But they had reason to.

Blinken, limiting himself to an agreed-on two minutes, started off by extolling “the rules-based international order” touted by the administrations of Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, and lamented recent Chinese actions in Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan.

Yang took 15 minutes to demand that the U.S. “fully abandon the hegemonic practice of willfully interfering in China’s internal affairs” and said China believed in “the United Nations-centered international system,” not “the rules-based international order … advocated by a small number of countries.”

Moreover, Yang said: “the challenges facing the United States in human rights are deep-seated. They did not just emerge over the past four years, such as Black Lives Matter.” China’s communists turned the Biden Democrats’ cheap-shot attacks on former President Trump’s and Republicans’ “systemic racism” and “white supremacy” against America itself.

“Many people within the United States,” Yang went on, apparently aware that Joe Biden hasn’t enjoyed the usual new president’s honeymoon in the polls, “actually have little confidence in the democracy of the United States.”

There was no question about Yang’s contempt. “The United States does not have the qualification to say that it wants to speak to China from a position of strength,” he said.

That is dangerous stuff. In Vienna, Kennedy was appalled by Khrushchev’s threats to block the United States from West Berlin and his insouciance about nuclear war. In Anchorage, Blinken and Sullivan showed awareness of China’s ruthlessness in Xinjiang, its breaking treaty obligations and its stamping out political opposition in Hong Kong. But both are done deals.

Looking ahead, their foremost concern is whether China is bent on absorbing Taiwan, “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” Yang insisted. The U.S. has agreed to recognize that view ever since Henry Kissinger laid the groundwork for Richard Nixon’s landmark 1972 visit to China.

But under the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, we’ve provided military aid and cheered on Taiwan’s transition to political democracy and its enormous economic growth symbolized by its near monopoly in high-tech semiconductor manufacturing.

Now Taiwan’s separate existence seems threatened by China’s increasing military strength and open rejection of rules-based order. British historian Niall Ferguson sees a Chinese military attack on Taiwan as possible, quite possibly successful and, if so, hugely consequential. “Losing — or not even fighting for — Taiwan would be seen all over Asia as the end of American predominance in the region we now call the ‘Indo-Pacific,'” he says.

The Biden administration, like the Trump administration, seems to be trying to prevent this. Before the Anchorage meeting, Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin met with counterparts in Japan and South Korea, and afterward, Austin went on to India. The prospects for “Four Partner” — U.S., Japan, India, Australia — cooperation to cabin in China seem good. Britain, perhaps chastened by the crumpling of its Hong Kong agreement with China, pledges in its Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy to be “the European partner with the broadest and most integrated presence in the Indo-Pacific.”

One question now is whether the Biden administration will follow up on the Pacific Deterrence Initiative passed by Congress and signed by Trump last December. As Elbridge Colby and Walter Slocombe, Pentagon appointees in the Trump and Clinton administrations, respectively, write, “The United States needs to establish an effective forward defense that can, alongside the efforts of its allies and partners, blunt any Chinese attack on an ally or Taiwan” — a $20 billion-plus enterprise.

That’s not a small change, especially in a country with two distrusting political parties, both with strong pulls toward isolationism. But the alternatives are grimmer. All-out war over Taiwan would have horrifying human and economic costs. Looking on while China conquers 24 million people would be, as Ferguson writes, “the American Suez,” an abdication of hard and soft power in the 2,500-mile radius Valeriepieris circle centered on the South China Sea, where half the world’s people live.

American public opinion over the last five years has turned bipartisanly critical of China. But can a hyperpartisan administration firm up the bipartisan support needed for a credible policy of deterrence against Chinese aggression against Taiwan?

Michael Barone is a senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and longtime co-author of The Almanac of American Politics.

COPYRIGHT 2021 CREATORS.COM

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
0 0 votes
Article Rating
simple-ad

This is a demo advert, you can use simple text, HTML image or any Ad Service JavaScript code. If you're inserting HTML or JS code make sure editor is switched to 'Text' mode.

Subscribe
Notify of
28 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

mina (@guest_1187741)
4 months ago

democrat party does not have what it takes to deal with china
the job is too big for democrats
everything democrats do turns wrong
no experience, no values, no truth , full of lies
are you going to publish my comments ? or judge them because you do not like them?
do not have USA first but last
power hungry only bullies

alicia cervera (@guest_1187807)
Reply to  mina
4 months ago

i MUST SAY BLINKEN ACTED LIKE A TOTAL WIMP. i would have walked out on the chinks and left them talking to themselves. And on top of everything he apologized …AGAIN another obama disgusting move..

Robert W (@guest_1187750)
4 months ago

Biden won’t “stand-up” against his benefactors in China, maybe we Americans need to learn Chinese mandarin!!!!

Sharon (@guest_1193903)
Reply to  Robert W
3 months ago

I think your right Robert. Blinken is NO Pampae (sp) they are afraid of China and will hold their coats. ChinaJoe is a weak person and the world knows it. GOD help us.

Randy Justice (@guest_1187783)
4 months ago

UNLESS WE THE PEOPLE OVERTHROW THIS LIBERAL APPOINTED GROUP OF COWARDS, THOSE LITTLE SLANT EYED HEATHENS WILL DO AS THEY PLEASE !!!! NUKE CHINA…..TODAY !!!!!!

Randy Justice (@guest_1187785)
4 months ago

OUR ENTIRE GOVERNMENT IS COMPOSED OF LIMP WRISTED LIBERAL COWARDS !!!!

James 75th Regiment (@guest_1187819)
Reply to  Randy Justice
4 months ago

Oh Yeah…Two W-88 Warheads, one for Beijing & the other for Shanghai. MacArthur would be proud…Put a end to all the bull_hit…

Gary m (@guest_1187852)
Reply to  Randy Justice
4 months ago

Not to mention the weak knee rhinos that are kissing there rear end. Isn’t this the reason that Trump was elected.

Edwin Buck (@guest_1187822)
4 months ago

The CCP reads this administration very well. They know that Biden is pretty much on life support. They also know that the Biden crime family is at the mercy of the CCP. Unless something happens very fast in Washington there will be WW3 coming very soon

Fed up (@guest_1187833)
4 months ago

The leaders of other countries are going to walk all over this administration because they’re incapable of dealing with them,we are in big trouble

Gary m (@guest_1187848)
Reply to  Fed up
4 months ago

Biden needs to hire Trump as his secretary of state.

Amy Houg (@guest_1187938)
Reply to  Gary m
4 months ago

No we need President Trump back, where he belongs, in the WH. Pompeo can handle China. And they weren’t bought, like biden/ harris dictatorship

Gary m (@guest_1187845)
4 months ago

If the Chinese attacked Taiwan, Biden would send them a have a nice day card.

Gary m (@guest_1187860)
4 months ago

Democrats are useless, they can’t even find the outhouse, how can they lead this country. All that they know how to do is destroy, they nothing of building or making things stronger. The Democrats have been in power only two months, and they have ruined the country. Remember that old saying give the Democrats a country and they will give you back a slum.

Gary m (@guest_1187861)
4 months ago

Why does Nancy need the National Guard:
Pelosi needs the NG to protect her while she and the other Democrats are are busy undermining the constitution, and violating their oath of office. In other words they are committing treason, and using the NG for protection while they are doing it, by keeping the people out. Who is visiting the capital with the troops all over the place. Maybe a few Chinese?

Gary m (@guest_1187863)
4 months ago

Solution to the problem:
of the press vilifying the police, by accusing the police of hunting down and killing minorities. The press has no evidence of such a trend. They are using this only to increase their ratings and sell papers. This is done by vilifying and endangering law enforcement officers, putting them more at risk for doing their job. The solution is simply to make the media and the press, also print the justification for their reporting, in other words if they can’t report the facts they should not report anything. If they report something that later is found not to be true, they must print a redaction on the front page, that covers at least half of the page, a long with an apology to any that might have been aversely effected by the report. You would soon see better more responsible reporting when the press sees redactions on the front page instead of hiding them in back where they are never seen. I think that all states need to put a law on the books, that would require all papers to put redaction on the front page, a long with an apology to any that may have been aversely effected by the report. Also media outlets could put redactions on their home pages for all to see. Now don’t you think that would be a good thing. To see people like Suckerberg, Darcy, have to take responsibility for reporting on their sites.

syble l.christensen (@guest_1187944)
Reply to  Gary m
4 months ago

Obama is the one Pulling Biden s’ Strings And Obama s’ Idea For America From the very First days Was To Steal enough of Our Tax Dollars To Make him Rich And to start Tearing America Apart He had Two Full terms To get Started and has Worked In the dark agenda to keep his Work going He wants America To fail Completely For his Fathers Dreams I don’t Know How but we Have Too stop him And Democrats from reaching That Point and it has To get done Now

Gary m (@guest_1187882)
4 months ago

Biden at the border:
This is the mess that a duly unelected president has made for the country. A man who has no idea of what he is doing, and who ever is pulling his strings does not either. They don’t want to call this a crisis that it is challenging, well it is a CHALLENGING CRISIS, a mess of epic proportions that needs a man of epic proportion to solve it. It needs a Trump to trump it. The people now on the thrown have shown that they are not capable of handling the situation, and therefore need to step aside.

Stephen Russell (@guest_1187897)
4 months ago

NO & wont since too many bribes etc owed by US to China.
Back to Obama era again..
Unless someone goes rogue in State or Defense.

Marie (@guest_1187902)
4 months ago

Biden and Harris need to be impeached and any Democrat that can not stand for America and our Constitution need to go to. Call, write and email your Representatives Senators daily until we get results. Write to the supreme Court about the treason committed in the election. Urge them to rethink their decision to not look into the election fraud before our country goes down in flames.
US Supreme Court, 1 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20543
You cannot call or email — you must write a letter!!!
Members of the House
202-224-3841
Members of the Senate
202-224-3121
TOLL FREE:
866-272-6622

Orrie (@guest_1193881)
Reply to  Marie
3 months ago

Those letters will be thrown into the trash bin!

StealthFighter7 (@guest_1187923)
4 months ago

The Chi-Coms are comming!!!! Where is Paul Revere????

Dave Pokorny (@guest_1187965)
4 months ago

This is the best time for China to do what they want with Taiwan. They
made all those little islands in the South China Sea, to stop anyone from coming
from the North. They only have to keep control of the South where Taiwan is.

Dave Pokorny (@guest_1188014)
4 months ago

I have a lot of love for Kennedy but I also remember that when Kennedy came out of that

meeting with a white face because Khrushchev scared the sh_t out of him. But Khrushchev

knew Kennedy was not going to back down “period”!

McRant (@guest_1188261)
4 months ago

Research using unbiased source(never done by libs)
2019 Unarm bl kld by plc 19
2020 13
BLM scam
No systm rac. 40 mil bks, 3 mil plc
Less than 20!

Ranton (@guest_1188265)
4 months ago

Biden demented
Harris immoral
Pelosi crazed
Blinken fool
Austin: nutjob ruining military: stand down for indoctrination CRT. #1 mission military: promote LGBT, not protect US

Sharon (@guest_1194197)
Reply to  Ranton
3 months ago

I just read the military said they have doctors ready to help trans transition. O m g Auston is a nut job but but biden and the left is pushing this .

Peter D Ramaglia (@guest_1188445)
4 months ago

Joe Biden and his elected staff are not capabile of running the US Govenment

OUR TWEETS

PRESIDENT'S TWEETS

Sign Up For The Daily Newsletter

SYNDICATED NEWS

28
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x